Prove that Lim x->c f(x)g(x)=0 if Lim x->c f(x)=0 and |g(x)|<K

  • #1
DumpmeAdrenaline
35
0
Homework Statement:
Suppose Lim x->c f(x)=0 and that g(x) is bounded by a number K>0 such that |g(x)|<K. Define h by h(x)=f(x)g(x). Prove that Lim x->c h(x)=0.
Relevant Equations:
|x-c|<δ -> |f(x)-0|<ϵ
|g(x)|<K
|x-c|<δ -> |f(x)-0|<ϵ
|g(x)|<K
|g(x)||f(x)-0|<K*ϵ
The product of the absolute values equals the absolute value of the product.
|f(x)g(x))|=|h(x)|<K*ϵ
For a range of input values within δ of c, the corresponding outputs can be made within Kϵ of 0. What if g(x) has a jump at x=c but is bounded by K. If approaching x=c from the right g(x) approaches L1 where |L1|<K and if approaching x=c from the left g(x) approaches L2 where |L2|<K. Will the above inequality holds because f(x)=0 and g(x) is bounded though discontinuous fg is again a zero function.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
24,016
15,702
The proposition is true even if ##g## is discontinuous at ##c##.
 
  • Like
Likes DumpmeAdrenaline
  • #3
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2022 Award
17,784
18,938
It works with zero as a limit since ##0\cdot c = 0## as long as ##c## is any number. If ##c\in \{\pm \infty \}## then we cannot conclude anything, which is why we need that ##g(x)## is bounded. But even if it jumps around, multiplying by zero will result in zero, i.e. the gaps become smaller and smaller if we approach zero. It would not work with any other finite limit.
 
  • Like
Likes DumpmeAdrenaline

Suggested for: Prove that Lim x->c f(x)g(x)=0 if Lim x->c f(x)=0 and |g(x)|<K

Replies
32
Views
907
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
147
Replies
9
Views
886
Replies
16
Views
537
Replies
5
Views
156
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
459
Replies
29
Views
895
Replies
5
Views
569
Replies
9
Views
556
Top