MHB Prove a_n=⌊2^n√2⌋ contains infinitely many composite numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Composite Numbers
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the sequence defined by a_n = ⌊2^n√2⌋ contains infinitely many composite numbers. Participants explore various mathematical approaches to establish this claim, emphasizing the need for rigorous proof. The suggested solution is acknowledged as not originating from the poster, indicating a reliance on existing mathematical theories or results. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem and the importance of collaboration in mathematical inquiry. Ultimately, the goal remains to demonstrate the infinitude of composite numbers within the sequence.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Prove, that the sequence:

$a_n = \left\lfloor{2^n\sqrt{2}}\right\rfloor,\;\;\;\;n = 1,2,3,..$- contains infinitely many composite numbers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suggested solution:
Suppose that the sequence ${a_n}$ contains only finitely many composite numbers, i.e. there exists an $N$ such that for all $n>N$, $a_n$ is odd.

Consider the binary representation of $a_n$ ($n>N$). The last digit of $a_n$ must be $1$, which in turn implies, that the fractional part of binary representation of $\sqrt{2}$ has all its digits equal to $1$ after the $N$´th position. This contradicts the irrationality of $\sqrt{2}$.
 
lfdahl said:
Suggested solution:
Suppose that the sequence ${a_n}$ contains only finitely many composite numbers, i.e. there exists an $N$ such that for all $n>N$, $a_n$ is odd.

Consider the binary representation of $a_n$ ($n>N$). The last digit of $a_n$ must be $1$, which in turn implies, that the fractional part of binary representation of $\sqrt{2}$ has all its digits equal to $1$ after the $N$´th position. This contradicts the irrationality of $\sqrt{2}$.

Hats off to you
 
kaliprasad said:
Hats off to you

The solution is not mine :o
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
900
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K