Prove an Associative Law (set theory)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the associative law in set theory, specifically the equality A∪(B∪C) = (A∪B)∪C. Participants are exploring the nature of set operations and the requirements for proving such statements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to use specific examples to illustrate the equality, while others emphasize the need for a general proof. There is discussion about the importance of showing that an arbitrary element belongs to both sides of the equation to establish equality.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various participants providing insights into the proof structure. Some suggest starting with an arbitrary element and demonstrating its membership in both sets, while others critique the use of examples as insufficient for a general proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that proving a general statement requires avoiding reliance on specific cases and that the proof must account for all possibilities regarding the membership of elements in the sets involved.

gunslinger
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that: A[itex]\cup[/itex](B[itex]\cup[/itex]C) = (A[itex]\cup[/itex]B)[itex]\cup[/itex]C

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I never had to prove anything but I'll try.
A[itex]\cup[/itex](B [itex]\cup[/itex]C).
Take:
A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, B = {5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}, C = {7, 8, 9, 10}
(B[itex]\cup[/itex]C) = P
If A[itex]\cup[/itex]P means A, united with the union of B and C, which is {5, ..., 10}. Their union is {1, ..., 10}
Now take (A[itex]\cup[/itex]B) = P
P = {1, ..., 10}
P[itex]\cup[/itex]C = {1, ..., 10}
With that I prove that the problem above is True :P But is that enough?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When proving a general statement, you need to avoid specific cases. Although working through a specific case may help you get the general idea on how to prove a statement, it doesn't prove the general case. When it comes to proving sets, the most common technique is to grab an arbitrary element from the set and show that since it belongs to a certain set it also belongs to this other set to and work towards your result. For example, let x be an element from the set A U (B U C), then x is an element of A or x is an element of (B U C). If x is an element of A...etc etc etc
 
gunslinger said:

Homework Statement


Prove that: A[itex]\cup[/itex](B[itex]\cup[/itex]C) = (A[itex]\cup[/itex]B)[itex]\cup[/itex]C


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I never had to prove anything but I'll try.
A[itex]\cup[/itex](B [itex]\cup[/itex]C).
Take:
A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, B = {5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}, C = {7, 8, 9, 10}
(B[itex]\cup[/itex]C) = P
If A[itex]\cup[/itex]P means A, united with the union of B and C, which is {5, ..., 10}. Their union is {1, ..., 10}
Now take (A[itex]\cup[/itex]B) = P
P = {1, ..., 10}
P[itex]\cup[/itex]C = {1, ..., 10}
With that I prove that the problem above is True :P But is that enough?

No, it's not. You can't prove a general statement by the use of an example.

One way to prove this would be to start with an element x that is an element of ##A \cup (B \cup C) ##, and show that it is also in ##(A \cup B) \cup C ##. This shows that the set on the left side of the equation is a subset of the one on the right side.

Now assume that x is an element of ##(A \cup B) \cup C ##. If you can show that the same element also belongs to ##(A \cup B) \cup C ##, you will have shown that the set on the right side is a subset of the one on the left side, which establishes the equality of the two sets.
 
If x is an element of A U (B U C). That means that x is either in A, B or C.
If x is an element of C U (A U B). That means that x is either in A, B or C.
 
gunslinger said:
If x is an element of A U (B U C). That means that x is either in A, B or C.
When you say "either ... or" the implication is that x is in one of them, but not the other. That is not necessarily true. It could be that A and B overlap (their intersection is not empty, or that A and C overlap, or that B and C overlap, or even that all three sets overlap.

So it's conceivable that x is in both A and B, but not in C, for example.
gunslinger said:
If x is an element of C U (A U B). That means that x is either in A, B or C.
I would write it as (A U B) U C, which is the way it's written in the problem. What I said above applies here as well.
 
gunslinger said:
If x is an element of A U (B U C). That means that x is either in A, B or C.
If x is an element of C U (A U B). That means that x is either in A, B or C.

Presumably you mean ##(A\cup B)\cup C##. While what you say is true, it doesn't constitute a proof. To show two sets ##M## and ##N## are the same, you show ##M\subset N## and ##N \subset M##. You are leaving out a lot of steps. So start out with supposing ##x\in A\cup (B\cup C)##. That means ##x\in A## or ##x \in B\cup C##, as you have stated. And if ##x \in B\cup C## then ##x\in B## or ##x \in C##. Now, depending on which is the case, you have to show in any event that ##x \in (A\cup B)\cup C##. You can't just declare it to be true. Give the details for each possibility. Once you have that, you are half done with the problem.
 
So, for (A [itex]\cup[/itex] B) [itex]\cup[/itex] C. Suppose x [itex]\in[/itex] (A [itex]\cup[/itex] B) [itex]\cup[/itex] C. That means x [itex]\in[/itex] (A [itex]\cup[/itex] B) or x [itex]\in[/itex] C. From x [itex]\in[/itex] (A [itex]\cup[/itex] B) we can derive that x [itex]\in[/itex] A or x [itex]\in[/itex] B.
 
gunslinger said:
If x is an element of A U (B U C). That means that x is either in A, B or C.
If x is an element of C U (A U B). That means that x is either in A, B or C.
I would give a little more detail. To prove "A U (B U C)= (A U B) To prove "if x is in A U (B U C) then it is s in A U (B U C)" (the statement says nothing about "C U (A U B)") we prove
1) A U (B U C)[itex]\subseteq[/itex] (A U B) U C and then prove
2) (A U B) U C [itex]\subseteq[/itex] A U (B U C)

And we prove "X [itex]\subseteq[/itex] Y" by starting "if x is in X" and using the properties of X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".

If x is in A U(B U C) then (by definition of "U") x is in A or x is in B U C. Again, by definition of U, if x is in B U C then x is in B or in C. So we have three possibilities
1) if x is in A then it is in A U B and so in (A U B) U C.
2) if x is in B then it is in A U B and so in (A U B) U C.
3) if x is in C then it is immediately in (A U B) U C.

Do the same to prove "(A U B) U C [itex]\subseteq[/itex] A U (B U C)".
 
Aha so firstly we prove how the left side is equal to the right and then how the right side is equal to the left?
 
  • #10
No. First you prove that every element of the set on the left is an element of the set on the right, and then you prove that every element of the set on the right is an element of the set on the left.

There's an axiom of set theory that says that an equality X=Y holds if and only if every element of X is an element of Y, and every element of Y is an element of X. That's what you need to use.

So you should start by saying something like "Let x be an arbitrary element of ##A\cup(B\cup C)##". Then you use the definition of ##\cup## to prove that ##x\in (A\cup B)\cup C##. Then I suggest you leave a blank line for clarity, and start the next paragraph with "Now let x be an arbitrary element of ##(A\cup B)\cup C##". The rest should be obvious.

This isn't precalculus by the way. Since set theory is usually studied after calculus, I will move this to calculus & beyond.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K