Prove Congruence: Prime p|/a & Additive Order of a Modulo p = p

  • Thread starter Thread starter kathrynag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that if p is a prime number and a is any integer such that p does not divide a, then the additive order of a modulo p is equal to p.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of p not dividing a and its relation to the additive order of a modulo p. There are attempts to clarify the definition of additive order and its properties in the context of prime numbers.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing insights and questioning assumptions. There is a recognition of the relationship between the properties of prime numbers and the additive order, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties related to additive order and prime numbers, with some confusion regarding the implications of p not dividing a. The nature of the proof and the assumptions involved are still under examination.

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


prove that if p is a prime number and a is any integer p|/a(p does not divide a), then the additive order of a modulo p is equal to p.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know p|/ a says a[tex]\neq[/tex]pn for an integer n.
The additive order of a modulo n is the smallest positive solution to ax[tex]\equiv[/tex]0 mod n.
Let p be a prime number and p|/ a.
Then we can say (p, a)=1. That is p and a are relatively prime.
That's as far as I got.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ax=0 mod p means that p|ax. If p does not divide a, what can you infer?
 
the additive order is p?
 
Why?
 
Since p does not divide a, there are no multiples of a that equal p. Thus, p must be the smallest additive order.
 
kathrynag said:
Since p does not divide a, there are no multiples of a that equal p. Thus, p must be the smallest additive order.

p not dividing a means no multiple of p equals a, not that no multiple of a equals p. And I don't see what that has to do with additive order anyway... 4 does not divide six, there are no multiples of 4 or 6 that give the other one, but the additive order of 4 mod 6 is three, not six.

If p|ax and p does not divide a, and p is a prime, what must p divide? This is the defining property of prime numbers
 
p divides x or p divides 1
 
p can't divide 1...

You should be able to finish the proof now
 
Ok I think this makes a bit more sense for em now. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K