Prove Existence of Real Invertible Matrix Q for A & B 2x2 Similar Matricies

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter samkolb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matricies
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion establishes that for two 2x2 real matrices A and B, if there exists an invertible complex matrix P such that B = P^(-1)AP, then a real invertible matrix Q can be constructed such that B = Q^(-1)AQ. The proposed method involves taking Q as the linear combination of the real and imaginary parts of P, specifically Q = X + αY, where X and Y are the real and imaginary components of P, respectively. The determinant of Q is shown to be non-zero under certain conditions, confirming its invertibility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix similarity and transformations
  • Familiarity with complex matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of determinants and invertibility criteria
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, including eigenvalues and triangularization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix similarity in linear algebra
  • Learn about the determinant function and its implications for matrix invertibility
  • Explore the concept of triangularization of matrices and its applications
  • Investigate polynomial functions of matrices and their roots in relation to invertibility
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in advanced matrix theory and its applications in real and complex spaces.

samkolb
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Let A and B be 2x2 real matricies, and suppose there exists an invertible complex 2x2 matrix P such that B = [P^(-1)]AP.

Show that there exists a real invertible 2x2 matrix Q such that B = [Q^(-1)]AQ.


A and B are similar when thought of as complex matricies, so they represent the same linear transformation on C2 for appropriately chosen bases, and share many other properties:

same trace, same determinant, same characteristic equation , same eigenvalues.


If I take Q = (1/2)(P + P bar) (the "real part" of P),
then I can show QB = AQ, and so B = [Q^(-1)]AQ if Q is invertible, but this Q may not be invertible.

I also noticed that each of A and B may be triangularized (since each of A and B has an eigenvalue), but I don't know where to go from there...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that P is invertible, right?
Then if Q = 1/2(P + P*), you can show that det Q = 1/2(det P + (det P)*) so if det P is non-zero, then so is det Q and you are done.
 
What if det P = i. Then det P + (det P)* = 0 (I'm assuming that x* means the complex conjugate of x). Also, if each entry of P is pure imaginary,then P + P* = 0.

I was unable to derive the formula det Q = 1/2(det P + (det P)*. Computing det Q explicitly in terms of the entries in P I got det Q = 1/2(det P + (det P)* + a) where a is a possibly nonzero real number.
 
Think more simpler.

How about Q = \alpha P for any real nonzero \alpha?
 
Let X and Y be real and imaginary parts of P (take the real and imaginary parts of each entry), so P= X+ iY.

We can rewrite the equation B = P^{-1}A P as PB = AP, or, using the above notation (X+iY)B = A(X+iY).

Comparing real and imaginary parts we get that X B = A X and Y B = A Y. Therefore (X+\alpha Y)B = A(X+\alpha Y) for all real (and complex) \alpha.

So, we prove the statement we only need to find a real \alpha, such that the matrix Q:= X + \alpha Y is invertible.
To see that it is possible, consider a function f(z) = \operatorname{det} (X+ zY). If all matrices are n\times n, it is a polynomial of degree at most n.

We know that f(i) \ne 0 (because P is invertible), so f(z) is not identically zero. Therefore it has at most n roots, so any \alpha avoiding these roots works.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K