MHB Prove: \(F(a,b)^*=F(a) \cup F(b)\)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
Kiwi1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
G. Shorter questions relating to automorphisms and Galois Groups

Let F be a field, and K a finite extension of F. Suppose \(a,b \in K\). Prove parts 1-3.

2. \(F(a,b)^*=F(a)^* \cap F(b)^*\)

Surely, they mean the union of F(a) and F(b) and not the intersection? There is no reason to think that \(b \in F(a)\) and therefore no reason to think \(b \in F(a)^* \cap F(b)^*\)?

Also what is the * about? Usualy I would expect \(F(a)^*=F(a)-\{0\}\) but I can see no reason to exclude the zero element. So has the author made typos or am I just confused?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kiwi said:
Also what is the * about?
That's the same question that I have. The * notation cannot refer to the nonzero elements. It seems to me that it must indicate some sort of dual structure. I suggest you look bach through whatever text these questions come from, to see where this notation is defined.
 
Could it mean the subset of elements that have an inverse?
 
You could have given us more information about the book you are reading. But on page 327 of that book, I read that $I^*=\mbox{Gal} (K:I)$ is the fixer of $I$. I have no idea what that means.
 
Thanks guys. F(a,b)* is the field of automorphisms of, a larger field containing F(a,b), that don't change each element in F(a,b). With that knowledge solving the problem is straightforward.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top