Prove: \(F(a,b)^*=F(a) \cup F(b)\)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of the equation \(F(a,b)^*=F(a) \cup F(b)\) in the context of field theory, specifically regarding finite extensions of fields. Participants clarify that \(F(a,b)^*\) refers to the field of automorphisms of a larger field containing \(F(a,b)\) that do not alter its elements. The notation * is interpreted as indicating a dual structure rather than excluding zero elements. The confusion regarding the intersection versus union of fields is addressed, confirming that the correct interpretation is indeed the union.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of field theory and finite field extensions
  • Familiarity with Galois groups and automorphisms
  • Knowledge of notation in abstract algebra, particularly the use of * in field contexts
  • Ability to read and interpret mathematical texts related to field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of automorphisms in field extensions
  • Learn about Galois theory and its applications in solving polynomial equations
  • Examine the notation and definitions used in advanced algebra texts
  • Explore examples of finite extensions and their automorphism groups
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in advanced field theory concepts, particularly those studying Galois theory and automorphisms.

Kiwi1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
G. Shorter questions relating to automorphisms and Galois Groups

Let F be a field, and K a finite extension of F. Suppose \(a,b \in K\). Prove parts 1-3.

2. \(F(a,b)^*=F(a)^* \cap F(b)^*\)

Surely, they mean the union of F(a) and F(b) and not the intersection? There is no reason to think that \(b \in F(a)\) and therefore no reason to think \(b \in F(a)^* \cap F(b)^*\)?

Also what is the * about? Usualy I would expect \(F(a)^*=F(a)-\{0\}\) but I can see no reason to exclude the zero element. So has the author made typos or am I just confused?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kiwi said:
Also what is the * about?
That's the same question that I have. The * notation cannot refer to the nonzero elements. It seems to me that it must indicate some sort of dual structure. I suggest you look bach through whatever text these questions come from, to see where this notation is defined.
 
Could it mean the subset of elements that have an inverse?
 
You could have given us more information about the book you are reading. But on page 327 of that book, I read that $I^*=\mbox{Gal} (K:I)$ is the fixer of $I$. I have no idea what that means.
 
Thanks guys. F(a,b)* is the field of automorphisms of, a larger field containing F(a,b), that don't change each element in F(a,b). With that knowledge solving the problem is straightforward.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K