Prove identity sec^-1(x) = cos^-1(1/x)

  • Thread starter physicsernaw
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Identity
In summary, the attempted proof of the identity sec^-1(x) = cos^-1(1/x) is not correct as it is not a true identity.
  • #1
physicsernaw
41
0

Homework Statement



Find and prove the identity sec^-1(x) in terms of cos^-1(arg) (Note that 1/cos^-1(x) is not equal to sec^-1(x).

Homework Equations



None.

The Attempt at a Solution



sec(sec^-1(x)) = x

1/cos(sec^-1(x)) = x

1/cos(cos^-1(x)) = 1/x

1/cos(cos^-1(1/x)) = 1/1/x = x

cos^-1(1/x) = sec^-1(x).

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
physicsernaw said:

Homework Statement



Find and prove the identity sec^-1(x) in terms of cos^-1(arg) (Note that 1/cos^-1(x) is not equal to sec^-1(x).

Homework Equations



None.

The Attempt at a Solution



sec(sec^-1(x)) = x

1/cos(sec^-1(x)) = x

1/cos(cos^-1(x)) = 1/x
How do you justify the previous step?
physicsernaw said:
1/cos(cos^-1(1/x)) = 1/1/x = x

cos^-1(1/x) = sec^-1(x).

Is this correct?
 
  • #3
The fundamental problem with try to prove "[itex]sec^{-1}(x)= cos^{-1}(1/x)[/itex]" is that it is NOT true! This is NOT an identity. For example, if [itex]x= \pi/4[/itex] [itex]sec^{-1}(x)= \sqrt{2}/2[/itex] while [itex]1/x= 4/\pi[/itex], cos(1/x)= 3.41, approximately.
 
  • #4
HallsofIvy said:
The fundamental problem with try to prove "[itex]sec^{-1}(x)= cos^{-1}(1/x)[/itex]" is that it is NOT true! This is NOT an identity. For example, if [itex]x= \pi/4[/itex] [itex]sec^{-1}(x)= \sqrt{2}/2[/itex] while [itex]1/x= 4/\pi[/itex], cos(1/x)= 3.41, approximately.
[itex]\displaystyle \sec(\pi/4)=\sqrt{2}\ [/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle \sec^{-1}(\pi/4)\ [/itex] is undefined, since [itex]\displaystyle\ \ \pi/4<1\ .[/itex]
 
  • #5
I would be inclined to write sec-1(x) as [itex]\displaystyle \ \sec^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{1/x}\right)\,,\ [/itex] then use the identity, cos(cos-1(u) = u , for the denominator.
 

FAQ: Prove identity sec^-1(x) = cos^-1(1/x)

1. What is the meaning of "Prove identity sec^-1(x) = cos^-1(1/x)?"

The expression "sec^-1(x)" refers to the inverse secant function, while "cos^-1(1/x)" refers to the inverse cosine function. The identity in question is asking for proof that these two inverse functions are equal.

2. How do you prove the identity sec^-1(x) = cos^-1(1/x)?

The proof of this identity involves using the fundamental trigonometric identities, manipulating them algebraically, and ultimately showing that the inverse functions produce the same result for any given value of x. It is a common exercise in trigonometry and calculus courses.

3. Why is it important to prove this identity?

Proving identities in mathematics is important because it helps to deepen our understanding of the relationships between different mathematical functions and concepts. It also allows us to use these identities to simplify complex expressions and solve equations.

4. What are some tips for successfully proving this identity?

Some tips for proving this identity include being familiar with the fundamental trigonometric identities, using algebraic manipulations to simplify the expressions, and working methodically step-by-step to ensure each side of the equation is equivalent.

5. Are there any applications of this identity in real-world scenarios?

This identity can be used in various fields such as physics, engineering, and finance to solve problems involving trigonometric functions. For example, it can be used in calculations involving angles and distances in navigation or in analyzing the motion of objects.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top