Prove Inequality: |1-K+x|/|1+y| < 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Only a Mirage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Only a Mirage
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given:

[itex]|x-y| < K[/itex]

[itex]x+y > K - 2[/itex]

[itex]0 < K < 1[/itex]

Prove:

[itex]\frac{|1-K+x|}{|1+y|} < 1[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried using the fact that [itex]|x-y| < K \Rightarrow -K < x-y < K \Rightarrow y-K < x < y+K[/itex] to write [itex]\frac{1-K+x}{1+y} < \frac{1+y}{1+y} = 1[/itex]

But I can't figure out how to show that the absolute value is less than one.

I have also been trying various applications of the triangle inequality with little success.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jbunniii said:
Hint: what does the given inequality ##x + y > K - 2## tell you about ##1 - K + x##?

It tells me that ##1 - K + x > -(y+1)##

which I actually had written on my paper before, but thanks to you I think I've realized the connection...Since I already had from the first assumption ##1-K+x<1+y##, I now have

##-(y+1)<(1-K+x)<(y+1)##, which seems to imply ##|1-K+x| < (y+1)## as desired.

Since we didn't know before that ##|y+1| = y+1##, it seems that this claim actually follows from the assumptions? I think it does since I think

##-A<T<A \Rightarrow A>0##, if both inequalities are satisfied, right?

Thank you so much for your help.
 
Only a Mirage said:
##-A<T<A \Rightarrow A>0##, if both inequalities are satisfied, right?
Yes, this implication is correct. Ignoring the ##T## in the middle of the inequality chain, you have ##-A < A##, so ##2A > 0##, hence ##A > 0##.

Note that the fact that ##y + 1 > 0## is important, because you are dividing both sides of each inequality by this expression. If ##y+1## was zero, the division would be undefined, and if ##y+1## was negative, the direction of the inequality would flip. Fortunately both of these possibilities are excluded by ##y + 1 > 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
jbunniii said:
Yes, this implication is correct. Ignoring the ##T## in the middle of the inequality chain, you have ##-A < A##, so ##2A > 0##, hence ##A > 0##.

Note that the fact that ##y + 1 > 0## is important, because you are dividing both sides of each inequality by this expression. If ##y+1## was zero, the division would be undefined, and if ##y+1## was negative, the direction of the inequality would flip. Fortunately both of these possibilities are excluded by ##y + 1 > 0##.

That makes sense to me. Thanks again for the help.