Prove Laplace Operator Unchanged in 3D Rotation

  • Thread starter Thread starter erica1451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the Laplacian operator remains invariant under 3D rotations. Specifically, if S is a rotation matrix satisfying S*S=I, and x' = Sx, the equality d²/dx1'² + d²/dx2'² + d²/dx3'² = d²/dx1² + d²/dx2² + d²/dx3² must be demonstrated. The solution involves constructing the rotation matrix for a rotation about the z-axis and subsequently applying symmetry arguments for rotations about the x and y axes. This approach confirms the invariance of the Laplacian operator under coordinate transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Laplacian operator in three-dimensional space.
  • Familiarity with rotation matrices and their properties.
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their notation.
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, particularly matrix multiplication and identity matrices.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of rotation matrices in 3D space.
  • Learn about the properties of the Laplacian operator in various coordinate systems.
  • Explore symmetry arguments in mathematical proofs, particularly in physics.
  • Investigate applications of the Laplacian operator in fields such as fluid dynamics and electromagnetism.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those focusing on differential equations and rotational dynamics.

erica1451
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that the Laplacian operator in dimension 3 is unchanged if the coordinates are rotated.


Homework Equations


If S is a rotation (S*S=I) and if x'=Sx then show d^2/dx1'^2 + d^2/dx2'^2 +d^2/dx3'^2 = d^2/dx1^2 + d^2/dx2^2 + d^2/dx3^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea how to even start this problem :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, can you write an expression for the matrix S such that S is a rotation, and the new coordinates are defined as x'=Sx where x=(x,y,z). Try writing the matrix for a rotation about the z axis, say, first. Then you need to prove that the equation you give holds for the primed coordinates.

If you manage to show this, you can argue by symmetry for rotations about the x and y axes.
 
Last edited:
I understand how to do the problem now. Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K