Prove Midpoints of Quadrilateral Form Parallelogram

  • Thread starter Thread starter spoc21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves using Cartesian vectors in two-dimensional space to prove that the line segments joining the midpoints of the consecutive sides of a quadrilateral form a parallelogram.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of vectors to represent the vertices of the quadrilateral and the calculation of midpoints. Questions arise about the correct identification of midpoints and how to demonstrate that the segments connecting these midpoints are parallel.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on identifying midpoints and checking for parallelism through slopes. There is ongoing exploration of different methods, including the potential use of cross products, but no consensus has been reached on a single approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the notation used and the need for clarity in the midpoint calculations. There is also mention of imposed homework rules that may limit the methods available for solving the problem.

spoc21
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use Cartesian vectors in two-space to prove that the line segments joining midpoints of the consecutive sides of a quadrilateral form a parallelogram.


Homework Equations



We could say vectors a and b

a = [a1, a2]
b = [b1, b2]

The Attempt at a Solution



Am really confused by this question..I would really appreciate it if anyone could offer tips to help me get started on this problem.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi spoc21! :smile:
spoc21 said:
We could say vectors a and b

a = [a1, a2]
b = [b1, b2]

So far so good! :smile:

Next would be

c = [c1, c2]
d = [d1, d2]

Now what are the midpoints of ab, bc, cd, and da ? :wink:
 
Hi tiny-tim,

so if we use the midpoint formula, we would get the following:

midpoint of ab = (a1+b1/2, a2 + b2/2)

midpoint of bc = (b1 + c1/2, b2c2/2)

midpoint of cd = ( c1+ d1/2, c2 + d2/2)

midpoint of da = (d1 + a1/2, d2 + a2/2)

Now I'm stuck, how would I show that joining these points would produce a parallelogram.

Thank you very much for your help!
 
You should identify the midpoints - give them names, such as by saying the E is the midpoint between A and B, F is the midpoint between B and C, G is the midpoint between C and D, H is the midpoint between C and D, and I is the midpoint between D and A.

Now if the segments EF and GH are parallel, and the segments FG and HI are parallel, then EFGH is a parallelogram.

One nit: In your midpoint formulas, add parentheses around the sums. E.g., ((a1 + b1)/2, (a2 + b2)/2)
 
ok, so I get the following results

EF = [(c1 - a1)/2, (c2 - a2)/2]
GH = [(a1 - c1)/2, a2 - c2)/2]

I'm a little lost here..(don't know how to proceed)

Also, you said "G is the midpoint between C and D, H is the midpoint between C and D, and I is the midpoint between D and A."

Are there two midpoints G, as well as H between C, and D?

Thanks for your help
 
I lost track of my midpoints. There should only be four of them E, F, G, and H - no I needed. I meant "H is the midpoint between D and A."

You can check that your vectors EF and GH are parallel by showing that their slopes are the same. The slope of a vector v = <a, b> is b/a.
 
ok thanks Mark..also, I was wondering if there is a way to solve this using the properties of cross products?
 
|u X v| = |u||v|sin(theta), where theta is the angle between u and v. If u and v are parallel, the angle between them will be 0 or pi, so the magnitude of the cross product will be zero.
 
So I have attached my working in pdf format, and would appreciate if you could just take a quick look at it, as I am unsure if this is correct...Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • #10
Hi spoc21! :smile:

ok, but a little long-winded.

(and why are you using square brackets instead of the usual round ones? has your professor told you to? :confused:)

It would have saved time and space to choose an easier notation

let A = (xA,yA) etc

then the midpoints are MAB = 1/2 (xB + xA, yB + yA) etc

and the vectors joining consecutive midpoints are VAC = 1/2 (xC - xA, yC - yA) etc

so VAC = -VCA and VBD = -VDB

in other words, opposite sides of the quadrilateral are parallel, and so it must be a parallelogram ("equal in magnitude" is a bonus, but not necessary for the proof) :wink:

(note incidentally that there would have been no need to use Cartesian coordinates if the question hadn't required them … you can just use vector symbols, eg mAB = 1/2 (b + a) etc :smile:)

EDIT: just noticed another way, that throws slightly more light on the position of the parallelogram …

use the fact that if the midpoints of the two diagonals of a quadrilateral coincide, then it's a parallelogram …

and those midpoints, for the new quadrilateral, are (both) 1/4 (a + b + c + d) …

so it's a parallelogram, and "centred" in the same place as the original quadrilateral :wink:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
13K
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
11K