MHB Prove No Integers Solve $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=1$ for x=19,2 for x=62

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Polynomial
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that no integers \( a, b, c, \) and \( d \) can satisfy the polynomial equation \( ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 1 \) at \( x = 19 \) and \( x = 62 \). The equations derived from these conditions lead to a linear Diophantine equation: \( 231469a + 3461b + 53c = 1 \). Since \( a, b, \) and \( c \) are integers, the equation must have integer solutions. However, the coefficients indicate that the left-hand side cannot equal 1, thus proving no integer solutions exist. Therefore, it is concluded that there are no integers \( a, b, c, \) and \( d \) that satisfy the original polynomial conditions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove that there are no integers $a,\,b,\,c$ and $d$ such that the polynomial $ax^3+bx^2+cx+d$ equals 1 at $x=19$ and 2 at $x=62$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, to start with, since $ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d$ is 1 when x 19, $a(19)^3+ b(19)^2+ 19x+ d= 6859a+ 361b+ 19c+ d= 1$, And since it is 2 when x= 62, $a(62)^3+ b(62)^2+ a(62)+ d= 238328a+ 3844b+ 62c+ d= 2$,

Subtracting the first from the second, 231469a+ 3461b+ 53c= 1. Since a, b, and c are integers that is a linear Diophantine equation.
 
we have $f(62) - f(19) = a (62^3-19^3) + b(62^2 - 19^2) + c(62-19) = 1$
or $(62-19)(a(62^2 + 62 * 19 + 19^2) + b(62+ 19) +c) = 1$
LHS is a multiple of 43 and RHS is 1 so this does not have integer solution
 
Country Boy said:
Well, to start with, since $ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d$ is 1 when x 19, $a(19)^3+ b(19)^2+ 19x+ d= 6859a+ 361b+ 19c+ d= 1$, And since it is 2 when x= 62, $a(62)^3+ b(62)^2+ a(62)+ d= 238328a+ 3844b+ 62c+ d= 2$,

Subtracting the first from the second, 231469a+ 3461b+ 53c= 1. Since a, b, and c are integers that is a linear Diophantine equation.
because this is a challenge question you are required to answer it fully . this is not a question for help
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K