MHB Prove: Positive Integer n Sum Equation

markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
prove by induction for all positive integers n: 1+5+9+13+...+(4n-3)= n/2(4n-2)
i tried this by trying to prove n/2(4n-2)+ (4(k+1)-3) = k+1/2(4(k+1)-2) but it did not work out for me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, so our induction hypothesis $P_n$ is:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n}(4k-3)=\frac{n}{2}(4n-2)=n(2n-1)$$

First we should verify that the base case $P_1$ is true:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{1}(4n-3)=(1)(2(1)-1)$$

$$4(1)-3=2-1$$

$$1=1\quad\checkmark$$

Okay, the base case is true. So, for our induction step, let's write:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n}(4k-3)+4(n+1)-3=n(2n-1)+4(n+1)-3$$

Incorporating the added term into the sum on the left, we have:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}(4k-3)=n(2n-1)+4(n+1)-3$$

So, what we need to do is demonstrate:

$$n(2n-1)+4(n+1)-3=(n+1)(2(n+1)-1)$$

Can you proceed?
 
thanks
 
$$n(2n-1)+4(n+1)-3=2n^2+3n+1=(2n+1)(n+1)=(n+1)(2(n+1)-1)$$

Thus, we may state:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}(4k-3)=(n+1)(2(n+1)-1)$$

This is $P_{n+1}$, which we have derived from $P_n$, thereby completing the proof by induction. :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top