Prove RO is Congruent to AR: Reasons Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter xashleyx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the congruence of segments RO and AR based on given geometric conditions involving perpendicular lines and angle bisectors. The context is rooted in triangle congruence principles and properties of angles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of various statements and reasons related to triangle congruence, particularly focusing on the AAS postulate and the definition of segment bisectors. Questions arise about the correct interpretation of geometric definitions and the implications of given conditions.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the statements and the reasons provided. Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the definitions and properties involved, while others express uncertainty about specific terms and their applications in the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through multiple options for reasoning that support the statements made, indicating a lack of consensus on the correct approach. The original poster expresses urgency due to multiple assignments, which may influence the depth of engagement in the discussion.

xashleyx
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
yeah, sorry. I'm in a desperate bind. i have like 8 different assignments due wednesday, and i don't know how to do any of them, and my teacher in summer school couldn't help me.

sub9-1.jpg


Given: AF is perpendicular to AR; OG is perpendicular to RO; AO bisects FG

Prove: RO is congruent AR

Statement:

1. AF is perpendicular to AR; OG is perpendicular to RO

2. angle A and angle O are right triangles

3. triangleFAR and triangleGOR are right triangles

4. AO bisects FG (Given)

5. RG is congruent to RF

6. triangle FRA is congruent to triangle GRO

7. triangleFAR and triangleGOR are congruent

8. RO is congruent to AR

Choose the correct reasons for the statements above.

a.1. Given; 2. Definition of perpendicular lines; 3. Definition of right triangles; 5. AAS postulate; 6. Vertical angle theorem; 7. Segment bisector; 8. CPCTC

b.1. Given; 2. Definition of perpendicular lines; 3. Definition of right triangles; 5. Segment bisector; 6. Vertical angle theorem; 7. AAS postulate; 8. CPCTC

c. 1. Given; 2. Definition of vertical angles; 3. Definition of right angles; 5. AAS postulate; 6. Segment bisector; 7. Vertical angle theorem; 8. CPCTC

i said it was a.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, #6 should read angle FRA is congruent to angle GRO.

a, b, and c are the same up until #5. What does the AAS postulate say and what does it mean to say something is a segment bisector?
 
If two angles & a nonincluded side of one triangle are congruent to two angles & the corresponding nonincluded side of a second triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.

a segment that divides a line into two equal parts.

so i think this makes 5 a segment bisector.
& makes 7. aas.

sorry if I'm being really stupid.
 
so i think this makes 5 a segment bisector.
& makes 7. aas.
Yes, that's right.

Actually in the AAS it doesn't matter whether the side is nonincluded or not--if you know 2 angles are the same between the two triangles you also know the 3rd angle is the same.
 
thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K