Prove Sequence: x>0,<n>→x,N s.t. n>N implies xn>0

  • Thread starter Thread starter silvermane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that if a sequence converges to a positive limit, then there exists a threshold beyond which all terms of the sequence remain positive. The subject area pertains to real analysis and the properties of sequences and limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of limits and consider using a contradiction approach. There is an exploration of finding an appropriate epsilon to ensure the sequence terms are positive beyond a certain index.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints related to the definition of limits and suggested specific values for epsilon to facilitate the proof. There is a sense of progress as one participant expresses clarity after revisiting the problem, indicating that productive discussion is occurring.

Contextual Notes

There was a typographical error in the original post that led to confusion about the problem statement. Participants are addressing this misunderstanding while working through the proof.

silvermane
Gold Member
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that if x>0 and <n> is a sequence with lim[tex]\rightarrow \infty[/tex][tex][/tex] = x, then there is a real number N such that whenever n>N we have xn>0.

The Attempt at a Solution


I was trying to prove this by contradiction, but got stuck. Any hints or tips would be greatly appreciated! No answers please :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean this?
Prove that if x>0 and [tex](x_n)_n[/tex] is a sequence with [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{x_n}=x[/tex], then there is a real number N such that whenever n>N we have xn>0.



Try to work with the definition of limits, i.e.

[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{x_n}=x ~\Leftrightarrow~\forall\epsilon:\exists N:\forall n>N: |x_n-x|<\epsilon[/tex]

Can you find an epsilon small enough such that the above definition garantuees xn>0 for n>N?

If you don't see it immediately, try finding this epsilon for some examples...
 
Oh dear. I don't know what happened after I previewed it, but I meant this:
Prove that if x>0 and [tex](x_n)[/tex] is a sequence with [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}{x_n}=x[/tex], then there is a real number N such that whenever n>N we have [tex](x_n)[/tex]>0.

That atrocious type-o changed the whole meaning of my problem; I'm terribly sorry :(
 
Hey, it been a while :-).

x-e < x_n < x+e

What happens if he pick e = x/2 ?
 
lol I think I got it!

We have that x>0, and for every E>0, there exists an N such that for every n>N, we have
|xn-x| < E,
and x-E <xn<x+E

Since this is true for any E>0, then it must be true for E =1/2x.
For n>N, we have that xn > x-1/2x = 1/2x >0.
Thus, xn>0, and we are done.

haha, I think just wasn't thinking clearly when I initially looked at the question. It seems soooo easy after doing this :)

Thanks for your help :blushing:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K