Prove that a sequence converges in this topological space iff

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the convergence of a sequence in the topological space (R,C), where R is the set of real numbers and C is a specific topology defined by open sets of the form (a,∞) for a in R, along with the empty set and R itself. Participants are exploring the implications of this topology on sequence convergence and the conditions under which a sequence is bounded below.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the nature of the topology (R,C) and its implications for sequences. Questions arise regarding the definition of neighborhoods and how they relate to the convergence of sequences. There is also discussion about the conditions under which a sequence can be considered bounded below.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on interpreting neighborhoods and their relationship to convergence. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of boundedness and how it relates to the limit of a sequence. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed, particularly concerning the conditions for convergence and boundedness.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the defined topology and are questioning assumptions about the nature of sequences and their limits. There is a focus on understanding the implications of being bounded below in the context of this specific topological space.

DotKite
Messages
81
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider (R,C). Prove that a sequence converges in this topological space iff it is bounded below
define ##C = ## ##\left \{ (a,\infty)|a\in R \right \} \bigcup \left \{ \oslash , R \right \}##

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So I am not very clear on how to wrap my head around what (R,C) actually means. I know that R is the underlying set and that C is the topology. So does that mean that, in this case, that all open sets in the underlying set, R, are of this form (a,∞)? And does that mean any open ball around a point in R is of that same form? Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DotKite said:

Homework Statement



Consider (R,C). Prove that a sequence converges in this topological space iff it is bounded below
define ##C = ## ##\left \{ (a,\infty)|a\in R \right \} \bigcup \left \{ \oslash , R \right \}##

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So I am not very clear on how to wrap my head around what (R,C) actually means. I know that R is the underlying set and that C is the topology. So does that mean that, in this case, that all open sets in the underlying set, R, are of this form (a,∞)? And does that mean any open ball around a point in R is of that same form? Please help

Yes, that's what it means.
 
OK so if we let ##\left \{ X_n \right \} \rightarrow x##, it follows that for each neighborhood ##V## of x, ##\exists N_0 \in \mathbb{N}## s.t ##X_n \in V## for ##n > N_0##.

Since ##V## is a neighborhood of x it contains an open set, call it ##O## that contains x.

Here I get stuck. Does this mean that ##\left \{ X_n \right \}## is in ##O## for ##n > N_0## and ##O## is bounded below by x?
 
Last edited:
DotKite said:
OK so if we let ##\left \{ X_n \right \} \rightarrow x##, it follows that for each neighborhood ##V## of x, ##\exists N_0 \in \mathbb{N}## s.t ##X_n \in V## for ##n > N_0##.

Since ##V## is a neighborhood of x it contains an open set, call it ##O## that contains x.

Here I get stuck. Does this mean that ##\left \{ X_n \right \}## is in ##O## for ##n > N_0## and ##O## is bounded below by x?

You are kind of taking it the wrong way, you don't even know ##X_n## has a limit yet. Suppose ##X_n## is bounded below by a number ##B##. What kinds of points do you think might be candidates for the limit? You know what the neighborhoods look like. Try to think in terms of pictures rather than writing a bunch of symbols down first.
 
arent you suppose to assume a sequence converges for the => direction?
 
DotKite said:
arent you suppose to assume a sequence converges for the => direction?

Yes, you are. I was thinking of the opposite direction. So ok, what are all the neighborhoods that can contain x?
 
Dick said:
Yes, you are. I was thinking of the opposite direction. So ok, what are all the neighborhoods that can contain x?
neighborhoods that can contain x,
##(a,\infty)## where a<x?
 
DotKite said:
neighborhoods that can contain x,
##(a,\infty)## where a<x?

Exactly. So ##(x-1,\infty)## contains all but a finite number of the ##X_n##. Does that show ##X_n## is bounded?
 
well we are suppose to show that ##X_n## is bounded below. I suppose it would be bounded below by x-1 if it is increasing, and bounded above and below if it is decreasing? The neighborhood going towards infinity is confusing me. I guess if it is decreasing it can't start at infinity it has to start at a point, and it would stay in ##(x-1,\infty)## and be bounded above by x-1
 
  • #10
DotKite said:
well we are suppose to show that ##X_n## is bounded below. I suppose it would be bounded below by x-1 if it is increasing, and bounded above and below if it is decreasing? The neighborhood going towards infinity is confusing me. I guess if it is decreasing it can't start at infinity it has to start at a point, and it would stay in ##(x-1,\infty)## and be bounded above by x-1

You are probably over thinking this. There is some N such that ##(x-1,\infty)## contains all ##X_n## with n>N. So those points are all bounded below by x-1. The points you haven't bounded yet is the finite collection ##X_1, X_2, ... X_n##. Are those bounded below (not necessarily by x-1)?
 
  • #11
oh i see. So take that finite collection and take the minimum, then that finite collection will be bounded below by that min?
 
  • #12
DotKite said:
oh i see. So take that finite collection and take the minimum, then that finite collection will be bounded below by that min?

Sure, so the whole sequence is bounded below by the minimum of that min and x-1. Now try the other direction. It's actually even easier.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
ok, so we assume that there is a sequence bounded bellow by some number. Call it ##\delta##. Thus ##X_n## > ##\delta## ##\forall n##. Let ε > 0. ##N_\delta## = ##\left ( \delta - ε, \infty \right )## is the set of all neighborhoods of ##\delta##. Notice that ##X_n \in N_\delta## ##\forall n## since ##X_n## > ##\delta - ε## ##\forall n##. Thus ##\left \{ X_n \right \} \rightarrow \delta##,
 
  • #14
DotKite said:
ok, so we assume that there is a sequence bounded bellow by some number. Call it ##\delta##. Thus ##X_n## > ##\delta## ##\forall n##. Let ε > 0. ##N_\delta## = ##\left ( \delta - ε, \infty \right )## is the set of all neighborhoods of ##\delta##. Notice that ##X_n \in N_\delta## ##\forall n## since ##X_n## > ##\delta - ε## ##\forall n##. Thus ##\left \{ X_n \right \} \rightarrow \delta##,

You've got the concept fine. Your notation is a little lacking. Having a lower bound δ means ##X_n \ge \delta##. Don't you mean to define ##N_\epsilon=\left ( \delta - ε, \infty \right )##? Try and rewrite that a bit. And what's maybe interesting about this topology is that ##\left \{ X_n \right \} \rightarrow \delta-1## is also true.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K