Prove that dim(V⊗W)=(dim V)(dim W)

Karl Karlsson
Messages
104
Reaction score
12
TL;DR
This proof was in my book.
(see image below)
Tensor product definition according to my book: $$V⊗W=\{f: V^*\times W^*\rightarrow k | \textrm {f is bilinear}\}$$ wher ##V^*## and ##W^*## are the dual spaces for V and W respectively.

I don't understand the step where they say ##(e_i⊗f_j)(φ,ψ) = φ(e_i)ψ(f_j)##. Why is this equality true? What definition has been used? My understanding for all of this is still quite basic.
This proof was in my book.
IMG_0775.jpg

Tensor product definition according to my book: $$V⊗W=\{f: V^*\times W^*\rightarrow k | \textrm {f is bilinear}\}$$ wher ##V^*## and ##W^*## are the dual spaces for V and W respectively.

I don't understand the step where they say ##(e_i⊗f_j)(φ,ψ) = φ(e_i)ψ(f_j)##. Why is this equality true? What definition has been used? My understanding for all of this is still quite basic.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is true because they define it that way. By definition, ##e_i \otimes f_j## is the bilinear map defined by $$e_i \otimes f_j: V^* \times W^* \to k: (\phi, \psi) \mapsto \psi(e_i) \psi(f_j)$$
It is just a definition. The only thing you should check is that this map is indeed ##k##-bilinear. We then obtain that ##e_i \otimes f_j \in V \otimes W## and it is then checked that ##\{e_i \otimes f_j\}_{(i,j)}## is a basis for ##V \otimes W## and since this basis has ##\dim V \dim W## amount of elements, you can conclude ##\dim(V \otimes W) = \dim V \dim W##.
 
It should have been part of the definition. As it is written, it suggests that it cannot be done otherwise, which would require a proof. However, uniqueness of the tensor product is easier to prove in the language of categories, rather than using coordinates. The way it was done in the book is a mixture of both - neither done rigorously. The shortest way out of the dilemma is to incorporate it in the definition:
$$
T\in V\otimes W \Longleftrightarrow T=\sum_{\rho=1}^R v_{\rho} \otimes w_{\rho} \, : \,(X,Y)\longmapsto \sum_{\rho=1}^R v_{\rho}(X) \cdot w_{\rho}(Y) \in k
$$
for some ##v_{\rho}\in V^*,w_{\rho}\in W^*## and all ##X\in V, Y\in W.##
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Karl Karlsson and member 587159

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K