Prove that elements in a neighborhood have their own neighborhood?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eclair_de_XII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving that elements within a neighborhood have their own neighborhood, specifically for the interval defined by ##(x-\epsilon, x+\epsilon)##. The proof demonstrates that for any point ##y## in this interval, there exists a ##\delta>0## such that the interval ##(y-\delta, y+\delta)## is contained within ##(x-\epsilon, x+\epsilon)##. Key steps include manipulating inequalities and applying the triangle inequality to establish the necessary conditions for ##\delta##. The proof is confirmed to be valid and can be expressed more concisely.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real numbers and intervals in mathematical analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of neighborhoods in topology
  • Proficiency in manipulating inequalities
  • Knowledge of the triangle inequality theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of neighborhoods in metric spaces
  • Learn about the triangle inequality and its applications in proofs
  • Explore more complex proofs involving neighborhoods and continuity
  • Practice writing formal mathematical proofs to enhance clarity and precision
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis or topology, educators teaching proof techniques, and anyone interested in formal mathematical reasoning and proof writing.

Eclair_de_XII
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
91
Sorry for the abbreviation above; character limits, and all. Anyway:

1. Homework Statement

"Suppose that ##x∈ℝ## and ##\epsilon>0##. Prove that ##(x-\epsilon,x+\epsilon)## is a neighborhood of each of its members. In other words, if ##y∈(x-\epsilon,x+\epsilon)##, then prove that there is a ##\delta>0## such that ##y∈(y-\delta,y+\delta)⊆(x-\epsilon,x+\epsilon)##."

Homework Equations


Neighborhood: "A set ##O⊂ℝ## is a neighborhood of ##x∈ℝ## if ##O## contains an interval of positive length centered at ##x##. In other words, there exists an ##\epsilon>0## such that ##(x-\epsilon,x+\epsilon)⊆O##."

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, so I get the feeling that I was supposed to do something else for this proof; specifically something I learned from this class. Here is the proof I wrote, otherwise:

"We start with the fact that ##x-\epsilon<y<x+\epsilon##. Subtracting ##x## from the inequality gives ##-\epsilon<y-x<\epsilon##, or ##|y-x|<\epsilon##. Then subtracting ##|y-x|## gives ##0<\epsilon-|y-x|##. Now we set ##0<\delta≤\epsilon-|y-x|##.

Now, we show that the interval ##(y-\delta,y+\delta)## is a non-empty subset of ##(x-\epsilon,x+\epsilon)##. We start with the inequality ##0<\delta≤\epsilon-|y-x|##.
- Adding ##y## gives ##y<y+\delta≤\epsilon-|y-x|+y##.
- Reversing the signs of the inequality and adding ##y## gives: ##y>y-\delta≥y-(\epsilon-|y-x|)##.

We take ##y-x≥0##. The case for if ##x-y≥0## is similar.

- Then the first inequality becomes: ##y<y+\delta≤\epsilon-|y-x|+y=\epsilon-(y-x)+y=\epsilon-y+x+y=x+\epsilon##.
- And then the second inequality becomes ##y>y-\delta≥y-(\epsilon-|y-x|)=y-(\epsilon-(y-x))=y-(\epsilon-y+x)=2y-(x+\epsilon)=(2y-2x)+x-\epsilon=2(y-x)+(x-\epsilon)≥x-\epsilon##

And so combining these statements yields: ##x-\epsilon≤y-\delta<y<y+\delta≤x+\epsilon##. And so there exists a ##\delta>0## such that if ##y## is an element of a neighborhood of ##x##, then there exists a neighborhood of ##y## such that ##(y-\delta,y+\delta)⊆(x-\epsilon,x+\epsilon)##."

I have a strong feeling that I was supposed to do something else, but cannot think of what it could be.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(I extended the title)

That works. You can do it more compact with the triangle inequality but analyzing the separate cases works as well.
Eclair_de_XII said:
Now we set ##0<\delta≤\epsilon-|y-x|##
I would write that as "now we choose a ##\delta## such that..." to make clear what you set. Alternatively you can explicitly define one (e.g. the average between the two sides).
 
Gotcha. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K