Prove that every unitary matrix is diagonalisable by a unitary matrix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that every unitary matrix is diagonalisable by a unitary matrix. The participants explore the relationship between a unitary matrix \( A \) and its eigenvalues, emphasizing that if \( C \) is composed of normalized eigenvectors of \( A \), then \( C^{-1} A C \) results in a diagonal matrix of eigenvalues. The proof hinges on demonstrating that \( C C^* = I \), which is established through the orthogonality and normalization of the eigenvectors, leading to the conclusion that \( C^* C = I \) confirms \( C \) is unitary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of unitary matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Knowledge of matrix multiplication and inner products
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of unitary matrices in detail
  • Learn about the spectral theorem for normal operators
  • Explore the concept of orthonormal bases in vector spaces
  • Investigate the implications of diagonalization in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying linear algebra, particularly those interested in the properties of unitary matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics and functional analysis.

Hall
Messages
351
Reaction score
87
Homework Statement
The same as the title.
Relevant Equations
A matrix is said to be unitary if A*A = AA* = I. A

A matrix ##A## is diagonalisable if there is a matrix C such that
##\Lambda = C^{-1} A C ##.
Let's assume that ##A## is unitary and diagonalisable, so, we have
## \Lambda = C^{-1} A C ##

Since, ##\Lambda## is made up of eigenvalues of ##A##, which is unitary, we have ## \Lambda \Lambda^* = \Lambda \bar{\Lambda} = I##.

I tried using some, petty, algebra to prove that ##C C* = I## but was unsuccessful. Here is my attempt:
## \Lambda = C^{-1} A C ##
## \Lambda^* = C^* A^* (C^*)^{-1} ##
## \Lambda \Lambda^* = C ^{-1} A C ~ C^* A^* (C^{-1})^{*} ##
## I = C ^{-1} A C ~ C^* A^* (C^{-1})^{*} ##
## I = C^{-1} AC ~ [ C^{-1} A C ]^{*} ##
That implies,
## [ C^{-1} A C ]^{*} = [C^{-1} A C]^{-1} ##
## C^* A^* (C^{-1})^{*} = C^{-1} A^* C##, since ##A^* = A^{-1}##.
But I cannot conclude ##C^* =C^{-1}##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question doesn't imply that a unitary matrix is only diagonalisable by a unitary transformation matrix. In fact, you should be able to see why that cannot be the case.

You cannot, therefore, prove that ##C## is unitary. Instead, you must show that you can find a unitary matrix ##C## that does the job.
 
If ##C = [u_1 ~ \cdots u_n]##, where ##u_i## is normalised eigenvector of A, then we can show that ##C^{-1} A C## will be a diagonal matrix, made up of eigenvalues of A.
But how do we show that CC* = I. We have only two facts with us, that every ##u_i## is orthogonal to every other ##u_j## and norm of each ##u_i## is 1.

So, we have
$$
C^{*}=
\begin{bmatrix}
\overline{u_1} \\
\vdots\\
\overline{u_n}\\
\end{bmatrix}
$$

$$
CC^{*}= u_1 \overline{u_1} + \cdots u_n \overline{u_n} $$

I really have no idea of what to do next.
 
Hall said:
If ##C = [u_1 ~ \cdots u_n]##, where ##u_i## is normalised eigenvector of A, then we can show that ##C^{-1} A C## will be a diagonal matrix, made up of eigenvalues of A.
But how do we show that CC* = I. We have only two facts with us, that every ##u_i## is orthogonal to every other ##u_j## and norm of each ##u_i## is 1.

So, we have
$$
C^{*}=
\begin{bmatrix}
\overline{u_1} \\
\vdots\\
\overline{u_n}\\
\end{bmatrix}
$$

$$
CC^{*}= u_1 \overline{u_1} + \cdots u_n \overline{u_n} $$

I really have no idea of what to do next.
You seem to be confusing matrix multiplication with matrix element multiplication.

What can you say about the eigenvalues of a unitary matrix?

If you can prove that a unitary matrix has a set of mutually orthonormal eigenvectors (or assume this), then you should be able to complete the proof using what you have.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Well, I can write C and C* in expanded form to avoid confusion:
$$
C =
\begin{bmatrix}
u_{11} & u_{12} & \cdots & u_{1n} \\
u_{21} & u_{22} & \cdots & u_{2n} \\
\vdots & \vdots & \cdots & \vdots \\
u_{n1} & u_{n2} & \cdots & \ u_{nn} \\
\end{bmatrix}
$$
Where the first column is the first normalised eigenvector, and so on.

$$
C^{*} =
\begin{bmatrix}
\overline{u_{11} } & \overline{ u_{21} } & \cdots & \overline{ u_{n1} } \\
\overline{ u_{12} } & \overline{ u_{22} } & \cdots & \overline{ u_{n2} } \\
\vdots \\
\overline{ u_{1n} } & \overline{ u_ {2n} } & \cdots & \overline{ u_{nn} } \\
\end{bmatrix}
$$

The ij th entry of CC* is
$$
CC^{*}_{ij} = [ u_{i1} ~u_{i2} \cdots u_{in} ] \times \begin{bmatrix} \overline{ u_{j1} } \\ \overline{ u_{j2} } \\ \vdots \\ \overline { u_{jn} } \\ \end{bmatrix}
$$

$$CC^{*}_{ij} = \sum u_{ik}~ \overline{ u_{jk} } $$

Then?
 
It might be clearer if you looked at ##C^*C##. Also, you should have complex conjugates of the elements in ##C^*##.
 
Not getting your hint. I have shown my attempts.
 
Hall said:
Not getting your hint. I have shown my attempts.
You must learn to recognise an inner product when you see one!
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Inner product: ##\langle u_i, u_j \rangle = 0##.
 
  • #11
It is easy to show ##C^{*} C = I##, that is:
$$
C_{\iota}^{*}=
\begin{bmatrix}
\overline{ u_{1\iota} } & \overline{ u_{2\iota} }& \cdots \overline{n \iota}
\end{bmatrix}

\times\begin{bmatrix}
u_{1j} \\
u_{2j}\\
\vdots \\
u_{nj} \\
\end{bmatrix}= C^j
$$

$$
(C^{*} C)_{\iota ~j} = u_{1j} \overline{ u_{1\iota}} + u_{2j} \overline{ u_{2\iota}} + \cdots + u_{nj} \overline{ u_ { n \iota} } = u_i \cdot \overline{u_j} = \langle u_i, u_j \rangle = 0 $$

Thus, all ij entry of ##C^{*}C## is zero, and by taking ##\iota= j## in the above formula I will get ##\iota- \iota## entry as 1.

So, ## C^{*} C = I##

I don't understand why ##C C^{*} = I## was so hard to prove.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K