Prove that if A and B are sets, then (A - B) U B = A U B

  • Thread starter Thread starter leo255
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the set equality (A - B) U B = A U B for any sets A and B. The proof involves demonstrating two inclusions: first, showing that any element x in (A - B) U B is also in A U B, and second, that any element x in A U B is in (A - B) U B. The participants highlight the importance of understanding the definitions of set operations and suggest avoiding unnecessary rewriting of sets to maintain clarity in the proof process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory concepts, including set difference and union.
  • Familiarity with logical notation and operations in mathematics.
  • Knowledge of basic proof techniques, particularly direct proof and proof by inclusion.
  • Experience with manipulating set expressions and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of set operations, specifically focusing on set difference and union.
  • Learn about direct proof techniques in set theory.
  • Explore examples of proving set equalities through inclusion arguments.
  • Review logical notation and its application in mathematical proofs.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying set theory, logic, or proof techniques, as well as educators looking to enhance their teaching methods in these areas.

leo255
Messages
57
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Prove that if A and B are sets, then (A - B) U B = A U B

I think I might be missing a few steps here.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



(A - B) U B =

1. (A ^ ~B) U B =

2. (A ^ ~B) U (A ^ B) =

3. A U B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Leo:

I think that whether a step is "missing" or not depends on what your teacher expects.
Hint:
(W ^ X) U (Y ^ Z) = ((W U Y) ^ (X U Y)) U ((W U Z) ^ (X U Z))
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: leo255
Issue with step 1 to 2: When I'm in ##B##, but not in ##A##, I'm in set (1) but not in set (2).
Issue with step 2 to 3: Set (2) is simply equal to ##A##, which may be smaller than set (3).

I recommend you do not try to "rewrite" the sets, but instead prove two inclusions: First take an arbitrary ##x \in (A - B) \cup B## and argue step by step why it is then in ##A \cup B##. Then take an arbitrary ##x \in A \cup B## and argue why it is in ##(A - B) \cup B##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: leo255

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K