Prove that if f and g are integrable on [a, b], then so is fg

3. The attempt at a solution

It suffices to show that f^2 is integrable, since

fg= [(f+g)^2-(f-g)^2]/4

The function x --> x^2 is uniformly continuous on the range of f,


im not sure how to turn this into a formal proof, im lost


Riemann integration
 
Last edited:
316
0
Which definition of integrability are you using?
 

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor
41,626
821
3. The attempt at a solution

It suffices to show that f^2 is integrable, since

fg= [(f+g)^2-(f-g)^2]/4

The function x --> x^2 is uniformly continuous on the range of f,


im not sure how to turn this into a formal proof, im lost


Riemann integration
You can't prove it, it's not true. For example, if f(x)= 1 if x is rational, -1 if x is irrational, the f2(x)= 1 so f2(x) is integrable on, say, [0, 1] but f is not. Also, if g(x)= 2, then g2(x)= 4 so is integrable on [0,1] but fg(x)= 2 if x is rational, -1 if x is irrational is not itegrable.
 

D H

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
15,259
679
3. The attempt at a solution

It suffices to show that f^2 is integrable
What if you can find a function f that is integrable on [a,b] but not square integrable?

You can't prove it, it's not true.
That much is true.

For example, if f(x)= 1 if x is rational, -1 if x is irrational ...
That's fine, but the title of the thread is "Prove that if f and g are integrable on [a, b], then so is fg", so you are picking some f that violates the given conditions.
 

The Physics Forums Way

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top