Prove that the closure is the following set.

  • Thread starter Thread starter rumjum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    closure Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The closure of a set S in a metric space (X, d) is defined as the set of points p in X such that the distance d(p, S) equals zero. This conclusion is derived from the definition of limit points and the properties of the infimum of distances. The closure can be expressed as S union S', where S' represents the limit points of S. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding sequences and their convergence in metric spaces, particularly referencing Rudin's text on real analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of limit points
  • Knowledge of sequences and convergence in real analysis
  • Basic understanding of the infimum and supremum in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of limit points in metric spaces
  • Learn about the closure of sets in topology
  • Explore sequences and their convergence in Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis"
  • Investigate the relationship between open and closed sets in metric spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians studying metric spaces, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of topological concepts related to closure and limit points.

rumjum
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose (X,d) is a metric space. For a point in X and a non empty set S (as a subset of X), define d(p,S) = inf({(d(p,x):x belongs to S}). Prove that the closure of S is equal to the set {p belongs to S : d(p,S) =0}

Homework Equations



Closure of S = S U S' , where S' is the set of limit points of S.

The Attempt at a Solution



Any hint would be useful. My line of reasoning is the following.
I started with a picture of all the metric space. I took cases like p being part of S and then p not being part of S. But, if p is not part of S, then the intersection of Neighborhood of p with some small radius , r with the set S could be null as d(p,x) > 0. Where as the least distance of any such point "p" and x is zero. Also, d(p,S) belongs to R. Hence, there shall be a real number between any nonzero d(p,S) and zero. As a result, all elements of inf{d(p,S)} = 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
p is a limit point of S if and only if there is a sequence s_i in S tending to p. Just writing the definition pretty much solves the problem.
 
Does not make any sense to me

Edit: Yup, it makes sense now. For some reason, the class on sequence is chapter 3 in Rudin but the homework problem given to me is after Chapter 2. so, it was not not easy understanding the subsequence part. However, I solved it in a different way.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K