Prove that the group ring Z p G is not a domain.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The group ring ZpG is proven not to be a domain when G is a finite group and p is a prime such that p divides the order of G. The proof utilizes the element g in G with order p, demonstrating that (g - 1)p = 0 in ZpG leads to a contradiction, as it implies g must equal the identity element, which is impossible. This conclusion is reached through the properties of commutative rings and the definition of a domain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically finite groups.
  • Familiarity with ring theory and the definition of a domain.
  • Knowledge of group rings, particularly ZpG.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation involving polynomials and formal sums.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of group rings in abstract algebra.
  • Learn about the structure and characteristics of finite groups.
  • Explore the implications of prime elements in ring theory.
  • Investigate examples of non-domain rings and their properties.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of group rings and their implications in ring theory.

hsong9
Messages
71
Reaction score
1
Prove that the group ring ZpG is not a domain.

Homework Statement


Let G be a finite group and let p >= 3 be a prime such that p | |G|.
Prove that the group ring ZpG is not a domain.
Hint: Think about the value of (g − 1)p in ZpG where g in G and where
1 = e in G is the identity element of G.



The Attempt at a Solution



Suppose that ZpG is a domain.

Find some g in G with order p. Note that g is not 1.

(g-1)^p = g^p - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0
However, since we assumed that ZpG is a domain, it follows that g-1 = 0, so that g=1 - a contradiction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Therefore, ZpG is not a domain.

Explanation:

A domain is a commutative ring in which the product of any two non-zero elements is also non-zero. In this case, we are considering the group ring ZpG, which is the set of all formal sums of the form ∑ r_gg, where r_g in Zp and g in G. Addition and multiplication in this ring are defined in the usual way for polynomials, with the additional rule that the elements of G commute with each other.

Now, let g be an element of G with order p. Since p is a prime and p | |G|, we know that g^p = 1, where 1 is the identity element of G. This means that (g-1)^p = g^p - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0.

If ZpG were a domain, then (g-1)^p = 0 would imply that g-1 = 0, since the product of any two non-zero elements in a domain is also non-zero. However, this would mean that g = 1, which is a contradiction since we assumed that g is an element of G with order p, and g cannot be equal to the identity element 1.

Therefore, we have shown that (g-1)^p = 0 but g-1 ≠ 0, which means that ZpG is not a domain. This completes the proof.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K