Rings, finite groups, and domains

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the group ring ZpG is not a domain when G is a finite group and p is a prime number dividing the order of G. The key argument involves the element (g - 1)p in ZpG, where g is an element of G. It is established that if ZpG were a domain, then (g - 1)p would equal zero, leading to a contradiction since g cannot equal the identity element e. Thus, ZpG contains zero divisors, confirming it is not an integral domain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, particularly finite groups
  • Familiarity with group rings and their properties
  • Knowledge of prime numbers and their characteristics in algebra
  • Basic concepts of integral domains and zero divisors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of group rings, specifically ZpG for various primes p
  • Explore the implications of zero divisors in algebraic structures
  • Investigate the relationship between group order and element orders in finite groups
  • Learn about the characteristic of fields and its effects on group rings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those focusing on group theory and ring theory.

hsong9
Messages
71
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let G be a finite group and let p >= 3 be a prime such that p | |G|.
Prove that the group ring ZpG is not a domain.
Hint: Think about the value of (g − 1)p in ZpG where g in G and where
1 = e in G is the identity element of G.

The Attempt at a Solution



G is a finite ring and p is a prime number such that p divides the order of G for k times.
since p is a prime less than the order of G , there exists an element a in G such that (ap) k = n where n is the order of G.
there exists an element (a m ) p such that ( a m )p* (am)q = 0
so, (a m )p and (am)q are the zero divisors in Zp G.
∴ Zp(G) is not an integral domain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


hsong9 said:
G is a finite ring and p is a prime number such that p divides the order of G for k times.
since p is a prime less than the order of G , there exists an element a in G such that (ap) k = n where n is the order of G.

That does not follow.

there exists an element (a m ) p such that ( a m )p* (am)q = 0

That is the product of two elements in the group, i.e. a third element in the group, so it cannot be zero in the group ring.

Note that you have ignored the hint given to you, and in particular at no point have you used the fact that the field has characteristic p.
 


How about this??

Suppose that Zp[G] is a domain.

Find some g in G with order p. Note that g is not 1.

(g-1)^p = g^p - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0
However, since we assumed that Zp[G] is a domain, it follows that g-1 = 0, so that g=1 - a contradiction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K