Prove that the set {X: XA = AX} is a subspace of M 2,2

  • Thread starter Thread starter sschmiggles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Subspace
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set W = {X: XA = AX} is a subspace of M2,2, where A is a 2x2 matrix. The user successfully demonstrated non-emptiness by showing that the identity matrix I belongs to W. They also proved closure under vector addition by adding two elements X and Y in W. The challenge arose in proving closure under scalar multiplication, which was clarified by recognizing that if X is in W, then cX is also in W due to the property XA = AX holding true for any scalar c.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix operations, specifically multiplication and addition.
  • Familiarity with the concept of vector spaces and subspaces.
  • Knowledge of scalar multiplication in the context of linear algebra.
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematics, particularly for linear algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces and subspaces in linear algebra.
  • Learn about the implications of the identity matrix in matrix algebra.
  • Explore scalar multiplication and its effects on matrix equations.
  • Practice writing proofs in linear algebra to strengthen understanding of concepts.
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, particularly those learning about vector spaces and matrix operations, as well as educators seeking to clarify proof techniques in mathematical contexts.

sschmiggles
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A is a 2 x 2 matrix. Prove that the set W = {X: XA = AX} is a subspace of M2,2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I have already proven non-emptiness and vector addition.

Non-emptiness:

Code:
W must be non-empty because the identity matrix I is an element of W.
IA = AI
A = A

Vector addition:

Code:
Let X, Y be elements of W such that XA = AX, YA = AY. Add the equations together.
(X+Y)A = A(X+Y)
XA+YA = AX+AY

Hence, X+Y is an element of W.

I have no idea what to do with scalar multiplication. This is my current attempt:

Code:
Let X be an element of W, and c be a scalar.
cXA = AcX
(cX)A = A(cX)

I also tried this:

Code:
Let X be an element of W, and c be a scalar.
XA = AX
c(XA) = c(AX)

I don't feel like either of these attempts proves anything.

I don't understand how to prove that cX is actually in W. This doesn't make any sense to me. How do I prove that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's too trivial.
You have X in W, thus XA=AX, thus cXA=A(cX) meaning cX in W.
Or in other word you've proved it already.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
It's too trivial.
You have X in W, thus XA=AX, thus cXA=A(cX) meaning cX in W.
Or in other word you've proved it already.
But how do I know that there isn't a scalar that would change X in such a way that (cX)A ≠ A(cX)?

Edit: I guess I get what you're saying now, but it still confuses me how I can just say that they're equal with no real evidence.
 
They are equal cause you have XA=AX, and then you multiply this equation by c.
I said it's trivial.
 
Remember that your scalar is some number, real/complex or something else.
It's not a vector (in which case multiplication of a matrix with a vector will not yield you a matrix of the same size but a vector, and thus it wouldn't be a vector space.
 
Yeah, I understand it now. This is the first class I've had to write my own proofs in, so I'm still getting used to it. Thanks again for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K