Prove that this sequence converges

  • Thread starter Thread starter playboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence defined by a_{0} = a > 1 and a_{n+1} = a^{a_n} converges if a < e^{1/e} (approximately 1.44467). The discussion emphasizes that the sequence is monotonically increasing and bounded above by e, confirming convergence through the theorem that states a monotonically increasing and bounded sequence is convergent. Participants clarified misunderstandings regarding the calculation of the sequence, particularly the importance of correct exponentiation order.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sequences and limits in Real Analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of monotonicity in sequences
  • Knowledge of the exponential function and its properties
  • Ability to work with inequalities involving e and exponentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of monotonically increasing sequences in Real Analysis
  • Learn about convergence criteria for sequences and series
  • Explore the implications of the theorem on bounded sequences
  • Practice problems involving sequences defined by recursive relations
USEFUL FOR

Students of Real Analysis, mathematicians interested in sequence convergence, and educators teaching advanced calculus concepts.

playboy

Homework Statement



Let a_{0} = a &gt;1 and let a_{n+1} = a^{a_n}.
Show that {a_{n}} comverges for a &lt; e^{e^-1} = 1.4446678



Homework Equations



This is a theorem I learned in Real Analysis and hope to apply it to this problem:


theorem: If a sequence is montonically increasing and bounded, then it is convergent



The Attempt at a Solution



{a_{n}} = {a, a^a, a^{a^a}, ...}

Clearly, {a_{n}} is monotonically increasing is is bounded below by a.

How do I show that it is bounded above?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
try induction assuming that a(o) is less than the maximum a value...
 
dmoravec said:
try induction assuming that a(o) is less than the maximum a value...


Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say...

Clearly,

a &lt; a^a &lt; a^{a^a} &lt; ... ... So I am having a hard time explaining how this is bounded for a>1
 
This doesn't mean anything. A sequence could be increasing and still be bounded. And e^{e-1} = 5.574941539. I don't think that's what you meant...
 
Last edited:
Werg22 said:
This doesn't mean anything. A sequence could be increasing and still be bounded. And e^{e-1} = 5.574941539. I don't think that's what you meant...

He meant e^(1/e). The formatting didn't come out 100% clear.
 
If a<e^(1/e) and x<e, what can you tell me about a^x?
 
Dick said:
He meant e^(1/e). The formatting didn't come out 100% clear.

Thank you for the correction Dick...I allways have trouble with this latex stuff :confused:


Dick said:
If a<e^(1/e) and x<e, what can you tell me about a^x?

If a<e^(1/e) and x<e, we can conclude that a^x < e

so a^x < e

hence,

:confused:

a < e^(1/x) ...


Can you please give me another push ?
 
Ok. a=a0<e^(1/e)<e. a1=a^a0. So a1<e. a2=a^a1. a1<e. So a2<e. a3=a^a2. a2<e. So a3<e. a4=a^a3. a3<e. So a4<e. How long do you want me to keep this up?
 
Dick said:
Ok. a=a0<e^(1/e)<e. a1=a^a0. So a1<e. a2=a^a1. a1<e. So a2<e. a3=a^a2. a2<e. So a3<e. a4=a^a3. a3<e. So a4<e. How long do you want me to keep this up?

Okay...I see it now.

it is bounded above by e.

a
a^a
a^a^a
a^a^a^a
.
.
.
.

for 1 < a < e^(1/e)
 
  • #10
You've got it.
 
  • #11
I can follow your example, but when i practicly pund these numers in my calculator, i find that it is not bounded by e.

for example,

a = 1.3

a < a < 1^(1/e) = 1.444...

(1.3)^(1.3)^(1.3)^...^(1.3) >>> e ... hence, not bounded by e.
 
  • #12
playboy said:
I can follow your example, but when i practicly pund these numers in my calculator, i find that it is not bounded by e.

for example,

a = 1.3

a < a < 1^(1/e) = 1.444...

(1.3)^(1.3)^(1.3)^...^(1.3) >>> e ... hence, not bounded by e.

(%o1) f(x) := 1.3^x;
(%i2) f(1.3);
(%o2) 1.406456673237886
(%i3) f(%);
(%o3) 1.446293346285982
(%i4) f(%);
(%o4) 1.461488869891772
(%i5) f(%);
(%o5) 1.467327108831111
(%i6) f(%);
(%o6) 1.469576402415039
(%i7) f(%);
(%o7) 1.470443905739509
(%i8) f(%);
(%o8) 1.470778619613915
(%i9) f(%);
(%o9) 1.470907784591691
(%i10) f(%);
(%o10) 1.470957631962913
(%i11) f(%);
(%o11) 1.470976869521044
(%i12) f(%);
(%o12) 1.470984293924533
(%i13) f(%);
(%o13) 1.470987159254924
(%i14)

Are you sure the calculator isn't doing f(x):=x^1.3? That's quite different.
 
  • #13
>> a = 1.3

a =

1.3000

>> a^a^a^a^a^a^a^a^a^a^a^a

ans =

110.1660




>> (((((((a^a)^a)^a)^a)^a)^a)^a)

ans =

5.1877


Perhaps i am miss-understanding how you are computing it.
 
  • #14
You are computing:
a_n = (a_{n-1})^a

You need:
a_n = a^{a_{n-1}}

It's a subtle difference in this case.
 
  • #15
Which do you believe, your reasoning or your calculator?

(%i8) a^(a^(a^(a^(a^(a^(a^a))))));
(%o8) 1.470778619613915
 
  • #16
Why would my calculator/matlab give a different answer.

The reasoing is correct, so shouldn't the calculator give the same answer as your showing?
 
  • #17
Is the warranty still valid on the calculator? Seriously, did you explicitly parenthesize it like I did? Powers are not associative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K