Prove the diagonals of a kite are perpendicular.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MklStar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perpendicular
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the diagonals of a non-square kite are perpendicular using vector methods. Participants are exploring the properties of kites and the relationships between their sides and diagonals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest using vector representations for the sides and diagonals of the kite, with some discussing the use of dot products to establish perpendicularity. Questions arise regarding the application of isosceles triangle properties and how to articulate these concepts in vector terms.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of how to effectively use vectors to demonstrate the relationship between the diagonals of a kite. Some participants have provided guidance on drawing the kite and considering coordinate systems, while others are questioning how to connect these ideas to the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the types of solutions or methods they can employ. There is an emphasis on understanding the geometric properties of kites and their implications in vector form.

MklStar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


As the title says, the question asks of us to: Prove that the diagonals of a non square kite are perpendicular using vectors.

Homework Equations


if a is perpendicular to b then a . b =0
normal vector addition and subtraction

The Attempt at a Solution


a kite made from points A B C D
..._a_A
....b| /\
...D...|/...\...B
...c|.\.../
....|...\/
C
AD = a + b
DC = a + c
b≠c
i know we have to use dot products but I am not sure how to implicate that into this...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try drawing the sides as vectors and the diagonals as the vector sum of two sides.
 
A "kite" is a four sided figure having two pairs of congruent sides in which the congruent sides are adjacent. One "diagonal" separates the figure so that two congruent sides are one side of the diagonal, the other two congruent sides on the other. That is, you have two isosceles triangles. An altitude of an isosceles triangle, to the non-congurent side, is the perpendicular bisector of that side.
 
I get what you mean but how would I explain that with vectors?
I don't think I can just split the kite into 2 isosceles triangles and just say that from the middle of the base to the top, the angle is perpendicular.
 
As I said, draw the kite with the sides as vectors. Each diagonal is the vector sum of two sides. Take the dot product of those two diagonals (written as sums) and you should see how they work out to equal zero.
 
You can always assume a coordinate system so that one vertex, where two congruent sides join, is the origin and the diagonal at that point is the y-axis. Then the other vertex on that diagonal is (d, 0) for some number d and the other two points are (a, 0) and (-a, 0) for some number a. Construct the vectors along the diagonals and take the dot product.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K