Prove the sums of the angles of any given triangle = 180°

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the sum of the angles in any triangle equals 180 degrees. The original poster suggests a method involving drawing a perpendicular from a vertex to the opposite side and using known results from right triangles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various cases for the proof, including right triangles and configurations where the perpendicular intersects inside or outside the triangle. Some suggest simpler geometric constructions, such as forming rectangles or parallelograms with triangles.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of the problem and various approaches being discussed. Some participants express confusion about the wording of the problem, while others attempt to clarify the implications of known results for right triangles. Guidance is provided regarding the consideration of different cases and the relationships between angles.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the assumptions made about the known results for right triangles and whether these can be applied to other types of triangles. There is also mention of specific angles and their relationships, indicating a need for clarity in definitions and setups.

r0bHadz
Messages
194
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


Prove that if A,B,C, are the angles of an arbitrary triangle, then

m(A)+m(B)+m(C) = 180 degrees by the following method: From any vertex draw the perpendicular to the line of the opposite side. Then use the result already known for right triangles

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I can break this proof down into 3 cases

a right triangle, with base b and height h, with the perpendicular of the vertex

a triangle with height h, and a base b+x, x>0 where its perpendicular is x units to the left of the right triangles perpendicular

a triangle with height h, and a base b+k k<0 where its perpendicular is k units to the left of the right triangles perpendicular

am I right here or are there other cases i need to consider?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To me,a simpler version will be:

Any triangle can be copied and flipped and placed beside the original one and form a rectangle,square, or parallelogram.

All of the three shapes above has the inner angle sum of 360 degrees, so ##\frac{360}{2} = 180##.
 
Young physicist said:
To me,a simpler version will be:

Any triangle can be copied and flipped and placed beside the original one and form a rectangle,square, or parallelogram.

All of the three shapes above has the inner angle sum of 360 degrees, so ##\frac{360}{2} = 180##.

This is my method as well but I am trying to follow the prompt given
 
I might just skip this because it's worded pretty weirdly tbh.. i don't even know if I get what it means. and like Yung physicist said, there is much easier way to prove what he is asking
 
r0bHadz said:

Homework Statement


Then use the result already known for right triangles
Which results are you implying here ?
 
TachyonLord said:
Which results are you implying here ?

If you have a right triangle, two angles will add up to 90 degrees
 
You basically have to consider these two cases where the height of the triangle ABC from vertex A, to side BC, the height being AD, and D is either inside BC or it meets the extension of the side BC.

In both cases you consider the right triangles ABD, ACD (D the right angle) and right two equations using the known result for right triangles. You add the two equations (or subtract the two equations in the second case with D outside) and you prove what is needed to be proved.
triangles.png


Oh and there is the third case where the triangle ABC is right, this case follows directly from the known result that you have to use.

EDIT : The case with D outside needs a bit more special treatment but the general idea remains the same.
 

Attachments

  • triangles.png
    triangles.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 877
Delta2 said:
You basically have to consider these two cases where the height of the triangle ABC from vertex A, to side BC, the height being AD, and D is either inside BC or it meets the extension of the side BC.

In both cases you consider the right triangles ABD, ACD (D the right angle) and right two equations using the known result for right triangles. You add the two equations (or subtract the two equations in the second case with D outside) and you prove what is needed to be proved.View attachment 236391

Oh and there is the third case where the triangle ABC is right, this case follows directly from the known result that you have to use.

EDIT : The case with D outside needs a bit more special treatment but the general idea remains the same.

Hmm. So for the first one, since I already know a right triangle has an angle of 90 degrees, and the sum of the remaining two angles = 90deg, that leave A1+C = 90, and A2+B= 90, adding together A1+A2+B+C=190, but A1+A2= A so A+B+C=180 deg

For the second one,

lets say C1 and A1 are inside the right triangle

we have C1+A1+90=180
C1+A1=90C1+C2=180
C1 = 180-C2

180-C2+A1= 90

A1+A2+B= 90

(90-C1)+A2+B=90

(90-(180-C2))+A2+B=90

-90 + C2 + A2 + B = 90

C2+A2+B = 180
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
I think you are right (as long as C1,C2, A1,A2 are the angles I think they are). Forgot to mark all the proper angles in the schemes.
 
  • #10
r0bHadz said:
If you have a right triangle, two angles will add up to 90 degrees
But that does arise from the angle sum property right ? So we're assuming that its true for right triangles and then proving for others ? (acute and obtuse triangles ?)
 
  • #11
TachyonLord said:
But that does arise from the angle sum property right ? So we're assuming that its true for right triangles and then proving for others ? (acute and obtuse triangles ?)
@r0bHadz does not state how the case for a right triangle was presented. However, the instructions state to use that result.

If you follow the sequence of posts referencing this issue, this becomes reasonably clear.

r0bHadz said:

Homework Statement


Prove that if A,B,C, are the angles of an arbitrary triangle, then

m(A)+m(B)+m(C) = 180 degrees by the following method: From any vertex draw the perpendicular to the line of the opposite side. Then use the result already known for right triangles.
TachyonLord said:
Which results are you implying here ?
r0bHadz said:
If you have a right triangle, two angles will add up to 90 degrees
I assume that @r0bHadz means 'the two acute angles add to 90 °.' .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TachyonLord
  • #12
Hint:
7d1d2882a49e24d7494a4504f38d4729c89bf688.png

α+β+γ=360°
∠CBA = ½β (why?)
etc.
 

Attachments

  • 7d1d2882a49e24d7494a4504f38d4729c89bf688.png
    7d1d2882a49e24d7494a4504f38d4729c89bf688.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 492
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: neilparker62 and nikilKRP
  • #13
r0bHadz said:

Homework Statement


Prove that if A,B,C, are the angles of an arbitrary triangle, then

m(A)+m(B)+m(C) = 180 degrees by the following method: From any vertex draw the perpendicular to the line of the opposite side. Then use the result already known for right triangles
Referring to the top diagram in post 7, I assume the "result already known" means ##D_1=D_2=90## (degrees). Then : $$D_2=B+A_1 $$ and $$D_1=C+A_2 $$ with D1 and A1 being in the left hand triangle. I'm not quite sure if we are "allowed" to invoke the theory regarding external angle of triangle as I have done ? In the second diagram (post 7) , we should perhaps rather drop the perpendicular from vertex C.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K