Proving 2^n - 1 Formula for Positive Integers | Induction Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the formula for the sum of a geometric series involving powers of two, specifically the equation 2^0 + 2^1 + 2^2 + ... + 2^{n-1} = 2^n - 1 for positive integers n. Participants are engaging with the principles of mathematical induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply mathematical induction by assuming the formula holds for k and then exploring its validity for k+1. Some participants question the complexity of the approach and suggest simplifying the process by manipulating the original equation directly.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the validity of the steps taken in the induction process. Some guidance has been offered regarding simplifying the approach, but there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the original poster's reasoning or the subsequent steps.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of uncertainty regarding the manipulation of the equation and whether the steps taken lead to a valid conclusion. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and approaches to the problem.

zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that the statement holds for all positive integers n

[tex]2^0 + 2^1 + 2^2 + 2^3 + ... + 2^{n-1} = 2^n - 1[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Assume:
[tex]2^0 + 2^1 + 2^2 + 2^3 + ... + 2^{k-1} = 2^k - 1[/tex] is true.

Then:
[tex]2^{k+1}-1 = 2^k(2) - 1 = 2(2^0 + 2^1 + 2^2 + 2^3 + ... + 2^{k-1})[/tex]

Not sure what to do next :/

Show that:
[tex]2^k(2) - 1 = 2(2^0 + 2^1 + 2^2 + 2^3 + ... + 2^{k-1})[/tex] is true
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi zeion! :smile:

You have the right basic idea, but you're making it too complicated. :redface:

Do the obvious :wink:

just multiply both sides of the original equation by 2 (and then fiddle about with it). :smile:
 
Haven't I already proved it?

Since:
[tex] 2^0 + 2^1 + 2^2 + 2^3 + ... + 2^{k-1} = 2^k - 1 [/tex]

Then:
[tex] (2)(2^0 + 2^1 + 2^2 + 2^3 + ... + 2^{k-1}) = (2)2^k - 1 = 2^{k+1}-1[/tex]
 
No, it isn't … be careful! :wink:

[tex](2)(2^0 + 2^1 + 2^2 + 2^3 + ... + 2^{k-1}) = (2)(2^k - 1) = \cdots\ ?[/tex] :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K