Proving a^0=1: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rijad Hadzic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that \( a^0 = 1 \) for any non-zero \( a \). Participants outline definitions of exponents, emphasizing that \( a^n \) is defined as the product of \( a \) multiplied by itself \( n \) times. They conclude that \( a^0 \) must be defined as 1 to maintain consistency with the exponentiation laws, particularly \( a^n \cdot a^m = a^{n+m} \). The consensus is that while this can be motivated by definitions, it does not constitute a formal proof, as it relies on accepted mathematical conventions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponentiation and its properties
  • Familiarity with basic algebraic operations
  • Knowledge of mathematical definitions and the concept of limits
  • Basic understanding of sequences and their convergence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exponentiation in detail, focusing on integer and rational exponents
  • Explore the concept of limits in sequences, particularly in relation to exponential functions
  • Investigate the definition and implications of \( 0! = 1 \) in combinatorial contexts
  • Learn about the continuity of functions and how it relates to defining powers for real numbers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students seeking a deeper understanding of exponentiation, particularly in contexts involving zero and negative exponents. This discussion is beneficial for anyone interested in the foundational definitions in algebra and their implications in higher mathematics.

  • #91
I always thought that a point is nil-dimensional.

Perhaps I didn't convey the meaning properly that a power is dimensionality... ( i hope you don't take all this so seriously, eh? )
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #92
PeroK said:
If we have a cube of side 2, it's volume is 8, Or, if we have a cube of bricks, with each side 2 bricks long, we have 8 bricks.

For a square of side 2, it's area is 4. Or, a square of bricks needs 4 bricks.

For a line of length 2, it's length is 2. Or, a line of bricks needs 2 bricks.

For a point, it's size is 0. Or, if we have a zero-dimensional array of bricks, then there are no bricks.

By this intuitive reasoning, we should have ##2^0 = 0##.

Very, very wrong.

2^4 is the Figurate Number represented by the vertices (points) of a hypercube ( Dimension 4 }

2^3 is the Figurate Number represented by the vertices (points) of a cube ( Dimension 3 )

2^2 ................ of a square.

2^1 ........... by the end points of a line. ( Dimension 1 )

And 2^0 is just the point or the atom itself of Nil-Dimension.
 
  • #93
rada you are quite right that we need the condition f(0) ≠ 0, and this is guaranteed by my assumption that f(x+y) = f(x).f(y) for all x,y, and f(n) = a^n for n = a positive integer and a > 0, since then f(1) = a ≠ 0, and thus f(x) ≠ 0 for all x. (if f(x) = 0, for some x, then for all y, f(y-x + x) = f(y-x).f(x) = f(y-x).0 = 0. i.e. thus either f(x) = 0 for all x or f(x) never equals zero.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
908
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K