Proving a<=b when a<=b1 for all b1>b in Real Analysis

Click For Summary
To prove that if a ≤ b1 for every b1 > b, then a ≤ b, one can use proof by contradiction. Assume a > b, which implies there exists a value b1, specifically (a + b)/2, that is greater than b. This leads to the conclusion that a ≤ (a + b)/2, creating a contradiction since (a + b)/2 is less than a. Therefore, the initial assumption must be false, confirming that a ≤ b. The discussion emphasizes the validity of using averages to demonstrate the contradiction without needing infinitesimals.
phygiks
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, got stuck on this question while doing homework. I would appreciate any help.
Let a,b exist in reals. Show that if a<=b1 for every b1 > b. then a <= b.

I really got nowhere. I tried letting b1(n)=b+nE where E is a infinitesimal. Then a <= b+nE for all n. Don't really know how to use any axioms here either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do a proof by contradiction. Suppose it's NOT true that a<=b. Then a>b. Where is (a+b)/2? Use that for b1. You certainly don't need infinitesimals.
 
I think I got it, so a>b, let b1 = (a+b)/2, then b1 > b, but a<= (b1=(a+b)/2). Contradiction
 
You've got it.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K