Proving a convergent sequence is bounded

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a convergent sequence \(b_n\) in \(\mathbb{R}\) with a limit of 3 is bounded. It establishes that there exists a natural number \(N\) such that for all \(n \geq N\), the inequality \(|b_n - 3| < 1\) holds. Consequently, the maximum value \(M\) of the sequence is defined as the greater of two values: \(M_1 = 4\) for terms beyond \(N\) and \(M_2\), the maximum of the finite set of terms before \(N\). The conclusion confirms that \(M\) can be any real number, not restricted to natural numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of bounded sequences
  • Basic knowledge of inequalities and their manipulation
  • Experience with LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of convergent sequences in real analysis
  • Learn about the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Explore the concept of boundedness in sequences and functions
  • Review LaTeX formatting for mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in real analysis, particularly those studying convergence and boundedness of sequences.

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
TL;DR
Suppose \[math]b_n\[math] is in \[math]\mathbb{R}\[math] such that \[math]lim b_n=2\[math]. Proving the sequence is bounded.
Dear Everybody,

I have a quick question about the \[math]M\[math] in this proof:

Suppose \[math]b_n\[math] is in \[math]\mathbb{R}\[math] such that \[math]lim b_n=3\[math]. Then, there is an \[math] N\in \mathbb{N}\[math] such that for all \[math]n\geq\[math], we have \[math]|b_n-3|<1\[math]. Let M1=4 and note that for n\geq N, we have
|b_n|=|b_n-3+3|\leq |b_n-3|+|3|<1+3=M1. The set A= {|b_1|,|b_2|,...|b_{N-1}| is a finite set and hence let M2=max{A}. Then Let M=max{B1,B2}. Then for all n in N we have |b_n|\leq B.

Should M be a natural number or a real number? If real, why?

Thanks
C.barker[/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can be any real number.
 
cbarker1 said:
Summary: Suppose \[math]b_n\[math] is in \[math]\mathbb{R}\[math] such that \[math]lim b_n=2\[math]. Proving the sequence is bounded.

Suppose \(\displaystyle b_n\(\displaystyle is in \(\displaystyle \mathbb{R}\(\displaystyle such that \(\displaystyle lim b_n=3\(\displaystyle . Then, there is an \(\displaystyle N\in \mathbb{N}\(\displaystyle such that for all \(\displaystyle n\geq\(\displaystyle , we have \(\displaystyle |b_n-3|<1\(\displaystyle . Let M1=4 and note that for n\geq N, we have
|b_n|=|b_n-3+3|\leq |b_n-3|+|3|<1+3=M1. The set A= {|b_1|,|b_2|,...|b_{N-1}| is a finite set and hence let M2=max{A}. Then Let M=max{B1,B2}. Then for all n in N we have |b_n|\leq B.
[/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math]
@cbarker1, one of your LaTeX is displaying properly. Take a look at our LaTeX guide. The link is in the lower left corner of the text entry pane.
 
Last edited:
Ultimately, you have finitely many terms $$a_n$$ that are not within a fixed $$\epsilon$$ of the limit $$L$$, and infinitely many within $$(L-\epsilon, L+ \epsilon)$$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K