Undergrad Proving a convergent sequence is bounded

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that a convergent sequence \( b_n \) is bounded, given that \( \lim b_n = 3 \). It establishes that for sufficiently large \( n \), \( |b_n - 3| < 1 \), leading to the conclusion that \( |b_n| < 4 \). The finite set of initial terms \( |b_1|, |b_2|, \ldots, |b_{N-1}| \) is also considered, allowing for the determination of a maximum value \( M \). A question arises regarding whether \( M \) should be a natural number or a real number, with the consensus that it can be any real number. The discussion emphasizes the bounded nature of the sequence as a key result.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
TL;DR
Suppose \[math]b_n\[math] is in \[math]\mathbb{R}\[math] such that \[math]lim b_n=2\[math]. Proving the sequence is bounded.
Dear Everybody,

I have a quick question about the \[math]M\[math] in this proof:

Suppose \[math]b_n\[math] is in \[math]\mathbb{R}\[math] such that \[math]lim b_n=3\[math]. Then, there is an \[math] N\in \mathbb{N}\[math] such that for all \[math]n\geq\[math], we have \[math]|b_n-3|<1\[math]. Let M1=4 and note that for n\geq N, we have
|b_n|=|b_n-3+3|\leq |b_n-3|+|3|<1+3=M1. The set A= {|b_1|,|b_2|,...|b_{N-1}| is a finite set and hence let M2=max{A}. Then Let M=max{B1,B2}. Then for all n in N we have |b_n|\leq B.

Should M be a natural number or a real number? If real, why?

Thanks
C.barker[/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can be any real number.
 
cbarker1 said:
Summary: Suppose \[math]b_n\[math] is in \[math]\mathbb{R}\[math] such that \[math]lim b_n=2\[math]. Proving the sequence is bounded.

Suppose \(\displaystyle b_n\(\displaystyle is in \(\displaystyle \mathbb{R}\(\displaystyle such that \(\displaystyle lim b_n=3\(\displaystyle . Then, there is an \(\displaystyle N\in \mathbb{N}\(\displaystyle such that for all \(\displaystyle n\geq\(\displaystyle , we have \(\displaystyle |b_n-3|<1\(\displaystyle . Let M1=4 and note that for n\geq N, we have
|b_n|=|b_n-3+3|\leq |b_n-3|+|3|<1+3=M1. The set A= {|b_1|,|b_2|,...|b_{N-1}| is a finite set and hence let M2=max{A}. Then Let M=max{B1,B2}. Then for all n in N we have |b_n|\leq B.
[/math][/math][/math][/math][/math][/math]
@cbarker1, one of your LaTeX is displaying properly. Take a look at our LaTeX guide. The link is in the lower left corner of the text entry pane.
 
Last edited:
Ultimately, you have finitely many terms $$a_n$$ that are not within a fixed $$\epsilon$$ of the limit $$L$$, and infinitely many within $$(L-\epsilon, L+ \epsilon)$$.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K