Proving a process is Brownian Motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around determining whether the process \{X(t)\}_{t\geq 0}, defined as X(t)=\rho B_1(t)+\sqrt{1-\rho^2}B_2(t) with \rho in (0,1) and B_1(t), B_2(t) as independent standard Brownian motions, qualifies as standard Brownian motion. Participants are exploring properties of the process, particularly independence and distribution characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss showing that increments of the process are normally distributed and question the independence of those increments. There is also inquiry into the independence of differences between independent Brownian motions at various time points.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of characteristic functions and properties of independent random variables, but no consensus has been reached on the proof or resolution of the original question.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of independence in the context of random variables and their distributions, with references to existing knowledge and tools that may aid in proving the necessary properties of the process.

IniquiTrance
Messages
185
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is the process \{X(t)\}_{t\geq 0}, where X(t)=\rho B_1(t)+\sqrt{1-\rho^2}B_2(t) Standard Brownian Motion?

Where \rho\in(0,1), \ B_1(t) and B_2(t) are independent standard brownian motions

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Obviously X(0)=0. Now let 0\leq t_1<t_2<t_3. Then, I can show that X(t_2)-X(t_1)\sim\mathcal{N}(0, t_2-t_1). My problem is showing that X(t_3)-X(t_2) and X(t_2)-X(t_1) are independent. I can show their covariance is 0, but that only implies independence if the process is Gaussian, which I have not shown. Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IniquiTrance said:

Homework Statement


Is the process \{X(t)\}_{t\geq 0}, where X(t)=\rho B_1(t)+\sqrt{1-\rho^2}B_2(t) Standard Brownian Motion?

Where \rho\in(0,1), \ B_1(t) and B_2(t) are independent standard brownian motions


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Obviously X(0)=0. Now let 0\leq t_1<t_2<t_3. Then, I can show that X(t_2)-X(t_1)\sim\mathcal{N}(0, t_2-t_1). My problem is showing that X(t_3)-X(t_2) and X(t_2)-X(t_1) are independent. I can show their covariance is 0, but that only implies independence if the process is Gaussian, which I have not shown. Any help would be much appreciated!

For i = 1,2 and j = 1,2, are the ##B_i(t_3)-B_i(t_2)## independent of the ##B_j(t_2)-B_j(t_1)##?
 
Ray Vickson said:
For i = 1,2 and j = 1,2, are the ##B_i(t_3)-B_i(t_2)## independent of the ##B_j(t_2)-B_j(t_1)##?

Hi Ray, yes they are.
 
Not sure how to proceed.
 
Are you implying that if A\perp B\perp C \perp D, then A+B \perp C+D, where \perp means independent?
 
IniquiTrance said:
Are you implying that if A\perp B\perp C \perp D, then A+B \perp C+D, where \perp means independent?

More than that: if A\perp B\perp C \perp D, then f(A,B) \perp g(C,D) for any (measurable) functions f(.,.) and g(.,.).
 
Ray Vickson said:
More than that: if A\perp B\perp C \perp D, then f(A,B) \perp g(C,D) for any (measurable) functions f(.,.) and g(.,.).

Thanks. How can I go about proving that?
 
IniquiTrance said:
Thanks. How can I go about proving that?

It depends on what you know already. Anyway, all you need is the result for A+B and C+D, and you can use any number of standard tools, but first you need to know what those tools are. Do you know about characteristic functions? What can you say about the density (or cdf) of a set of independent random variables? How can you test whether two random variables (A+B and C+D in this case) are independent?

All of these things can be found in books and articles---many freely available on-line---so I will leave it to you to search for the answers if you do not know them already. If you do know them already, just think about how you would use them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
999
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K