MHB Proving an absolute value inequality

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality if |a| ≤ b, then -b ≤ a ≤ b, for real numbers a and b. The definition of absolute value is clarified, distinguishing cases where a is non-negative and negative. In Case I, it is noted that if a ≥ 0, then |a| = a, leading to a ≤ b, while in Case II, if a < 0, then |a| = -a, resulting in -b < 0 ≤ a. Participants express confusion regarding the logical structure of the proof, particularly the incorrect assertion that a > b in Case I. The need for a clearer, more coherent proof is emphasized.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
If $\left| a \right| \le b$, then $-b\le a\le b$.
Let $a,b \in\Bbb{R}$ The definition of the absolute value is $ \left| x \right|= x, x\ge 0$ and $\left| x \right|=-x, x< 0$, where x is some real number.

Case I:$a\ge 0$, $\left| a \right|=a>b$

Case II: a<0, $\left| a \right|=-a<b$the solution is $-b<0\le a\le b$

I work on a number line. yet I still have trouble with the proof.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
At which point of the proof are you facing difficulties?
 
Well, I, for one, have trouble understanding the proof since I don't follow its logical structure, and not just because $a>b$ should be $a\le b$ in case I. Maybe someone can write a more coherent proof.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top