So, I would like to prove that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\gamma^{\mu_{1}...\mu_{r}}=(-)^{r(r-1)/2}\gamma^{\mu_{r}...\mu_{1}}[/tex]

where the matrix gamma is a totally antisymmetric matrix defined as [itex]\gamma^{\mu_{1}...\mu_{r}}=\gamma^{[\mu_{1}}\gamma^{\mu_{2}}...\gamma^{\mu_{r}]}[/itex]

What I have done is to prove that

[tex]\gamma^{\mu_{1}...\mu_{r}}=(-)^{(r-1)+(r-2)+...+1}\gamma^{\mu_{r}...\mu_{1}}[/tex]

by simply commuting all the matrices past each other until their order is reversed (picking up just the minus sign as they are antisymmetrised, so we can take [itex]\mu_{i}\neq\mu_{j}[/itex] for [itex]i\neq j[/itex]).

What's a nice way to see that [itex](r-1)+(r-2)+...+1=r(r-1)/2[/itex]? It works for some values of r, which one can see by substituting in.

ALSO - PART 2

I am aware of [itex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n=\frac{x(x+1)}{2}=-\frac{1}{12}[/itex],

but I found out that

[tex]\int^{1}_{0}\frac{x(x-1)}{2}dx=-\frac{1}{12}[/tex]

Any comments or clarifications on this relationship between [itex]\frac{x(x-1)}{2}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{x(x+1)}{2}[/itex].

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Proving an identity and some interesting maths stuff

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**