Proving angle sum trig identies w/ vector and scalar products

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving angle sum trigonometric identities using vector and scalar products, specifically addressing common mistakes in the proof process. The primary error identified is the incorrect notation of vector multiplication, where ##\vec{A}\vec{B}## is improperly used instead of the dot product ##\vec{A}\cdot\vec{B}##. Additionally, the discussion highlights the issue of circular reasoning, as the identity being proven is inadvertently used in the proof itself. Clear intermediate steps are essential for a valid proof in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations, specifically dot products and cross products.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities and their applications in vector mathematics.
  • Knowledge of angle sum identities in trigonometry.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proof techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector dot products and their geometric interpretations.
  • Learn how to express trigonometric identities using vector notation.
  • Explore alternative methods for proving trigonometric identities, such as using unit circles.
  • Practice writing detailed mathematical proofs with clear intermediate steps.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying vector mathematics, educators teaching trigonometry, and anyone interested in mastering mathematical proof techniques in the context of trigonometric identities.

bossman007
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to prove both of these (in exercise 11)

[PLAIN]http://postimage.org/image/x7shxv11f/ [/PLAIN]

Homework Equations



The dot product

The Attempt at a Solution



problem.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean where did you go wrong? Isn't that what you were asked to prove? You really need to write down some intermediate steps though. It's impossible to follow your "proof" as it is now. Now you just wrote down the starting point and the end result.
 
Your first mistake is in the very first line: What is ##\vec{A}\vec{B}\cos(\theta+\phi)## supposed to mean? You can't just stick two vectors next to each other like that. ##\vec{A}\cdot\vec{B}## makes sense because it's saying your dotting the two vectors together; similarly, ##\vec{A}\times\vec{B}## makes sense because it's saying you're taking the cross product. ##\vec{A}\vec{B}## doesn't mean anything.

Your second mistake is that you're using the very identity you're trying to prove. So far, you're using the fact that ##\vec{A}\cdot\vec{B} = |\vec{A}||\vec{B}|\cos(\theta+\phi)##. You need to find a second way to express the dot product.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K