Dot product and basis vectors in a Euclidean Space

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing the length of a vector in terms of its dot product within an arbitrary system in Euclidean space. Participants explore the implications of different basis vectors and the properties of inner products.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss whether the expression for the length of a vector using the dot product is limited to Cartesian coordinates and standard basis vectors. Questions arise about defining inner products in arbitrary vector spaces and the implications of non-unit length basis vectors.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing insights into the independence of the inner product from the basis and the conditions under which transformations maintain the equality of dot products. There is a focus on understanding the role of the transformation matrix in relation to the new basis.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the necessity of a specific inner product structure and the conditions required for transformations between different bases. The discussion acknowledges the complexity of defining vector lengths in non-standard bases.

Mathematicsresear
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am asked to write an expression for the length of a vector V in terms of its dot product in an arbitrary system in Euclidean space.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The dot product of a vector a with itself can be given by I a I2. Does that expression only apply for vectors in cartesian coordinates with the standard basis vectors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematicsresear said:

Homework Statement


I am asked to write an expression for the length of a vector V in terms of its dot product in an arbitrary system in Euclidean space.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The dot product of a vector a with itself can be given by I a I2. Does that expression only apply for vectors in cartesian coordinates with the standard basis vectors?
No, it is independent of a basis. You can define an inner product (dot product, scalar product) by it's properties alone. Of course, if given a certain vector space, you have to decide somehow whether such a product exists. But you can also just say: Given a vector space with an inner product. Then ... , in which case you won't have to bother whether such a vector space exists or not. The inner product, i.e. if not degenerate and positive definite, defines a norm by ##a \cdot a = (a,a)=|a|^2## which is commonly used as its length (squared). You can also define angles with the help of an inner product. Together this means that we can do geometry in such spaces.
 
fresh_42 said:
No, it is independent of a basis. You can define an inner product (dot product, scalar product) by it's properties alone. Of course, if given a certain vector space, you have to decide somehow whether such a product exists. But you can also just say: Given a vector space with an inner product. Then ... , in which case you won't have to bother whether such a vector space exists or not. The inner product, i.e. if not degenerate and positive definite, defines a norm by ##a \cdot a = (a,a)=|a|^2## which is commonly used as its length (squared). You can also define angles with the help of an inner product. Together this means that we can do geometry in such spaces.
What about if I wanted to write an expression for the length of a vector a, given that the basis vectors are not of unit length, how would I proceed?
 
Mathematicsresear said:

Homework Statement


I am asked to write an expression for the length of a vector V in terms of its dot product in an arbitrary system in Euclidean space.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The dot product of a vector a with itself can be given by I a I2. Does that expression only apply for vectors in cartesian coordinates with the standard basis vectors?
I think you can answer that question. What is the length of a vector ##\vec V_1 = (r,\theta)## in polar coordinates? Would applying a dot product to ##(r,\theta)## give you that length?
Do cartesian coordinates need to be stated in terms of standard basis vectors? Suppose you started with a vector ##\vec V_2 = x\vec i + y\vec j + z\vec k## and stated it in terms of an arbitrary basis by applying a linear transformation ##A## to get ##\vec V_3 = A \vec V_2##. Under what conditions would ##\vec V_2 \cdot \vec V_2 = \vec V_3 \cdot \vec V_3##? What does that tell you about the transformation matrix ##A##, and the new basis?
 
Mathematicsresear said:
What about if I wanted to write an expression for the length of a vector a, given that the basis vectors are not of unit length, how would I proceed?
In general you have a positive definite, symmetric matrix ##A## and an inner product ##v\cdot w := v^\tau A w##. Now you can do whatever you want to your basis. The matrix ##A## needs one, as well as the vectors if you want to set up calculations. Without them, that's all which is needed. Note that ##A## is not necessary the identity matrix as in the standard inner product in ##\mathbb{R}^n\,!##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K