Proving B_{r} is Open: Multivariable Proofs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the set B_{r}((x_{0}, y_{0})) = {(x,y) : ||(x,y) - (x_{0}, y_{0})|| < r} is an open set in R. It is established that a set is open if all points are interior points, which implies the absence of boundary points. The proof involves selecting a point (a,b) within B_{r} and demonstrating that a neighborhood around this point also lies entirely within B_{r}. The triangle inequality is highlighted as a crucial tool for this proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of open sets in topology
  • Familiarity with the triangle inequality in metric spaces
  • Knowledge of neighborhoods in R²
  • Basic proof techniques in real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of open sets in metric spaces
  • Learn about the triangle inequality and its applications in proofs
  • Explore the concept of neighborhoods and interior points in topology
  • Practice constructing proofs in real analysis, focusing on open sets
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis and topology, as well as educators looking for proof techniques related to open sets in metric spaces.

bobsmiters
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have no luck with proofs...

Prove that B[tex]_{r}[/tex] ((x[tex]_{0}[/tex], y[tex]_{0}[/tex])) = {(x,y) : || (x,y) - (x[tex]_{0}[/tex], y[tex]_{0}[/tex])|| < r} is an open set in R.

Now I know that to be an open set if and only if each of its points is an interior point and if it contains no boundary points. I would consider trying to prove it for any (a,b) [tex]\in[/tex] B[tex]_{r}[/tex]

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bobsmiters said:
I have no luck with proofs...

Prove that B[tex]_{r}[/tex] ((x[tex]_{0}[/tex], y[tex]_{0}[/tex])) = {(x,y) : || (x,y) - (x[tex]_{0}[/tex], y[tex]_{0}[/tex])|| < r} is an open set in R.

Now I know that to be an open set if and only if each of its points is an interior point and if it contains no boundary points. I would consider trying to prove it for any (a,b) [tex]\in[/tex] B[tex]_{r}[/tex]
You don't need to prove both of those. If all points are interior points, then none of them can be boundary points. Standard proofs that a given set are open show that every point is an interior point.

You are starting correctly. let (a,b) be some point in Br. Then its distance from (x0,y0) is strictly less than r. You need to show that there exist some neighborhood of (a,b) consisting entirely of points that are in Br: that is, that their distance from (x0,y0) is also strictly less than r.

It might be a good idea to draw a picture: Br is, of course, the disk inside the circle around (x0,y0) of radius r. Hint: the triangle inequality is very helpful here!

By the way, I know a professor who says that it was being able to do precisely this proof as an undergraduate that convinced him he could be a mathematician!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let [tex]x\in B(a,r)[/tex]. Then let [tex]\epsilon = r - |x-a|[/tex]. Show that [tex]B(x,\epsilon) \subset B(a,r)[/tex]. To show this you need to show given any [tex]y\in B(x,\epsilon)\implies y\in B(a,r)[/tex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K