Proving Congruence Classes: [a][b]=1 iff gcd(a,n)=1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Juanriq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a statement related to congruence classes in modular arithmetic, specifically concerning the existence of an element in the set of integers modulo n, denoted as [a] in ℤ_n, such that [a][b] = 1 if and only if gcd(a, n) = 1.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove the implications of the statement, particularly focusing on the case where gcd(a, n) = 1 and its relation to the product of congruence classes. They express uncertainty about the reverse implication and explore the meaning of [ab] = [1] in the context of integers.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing guidance on translating the implications into the integers. There is an ongoing exploration of the meaning of equivalence class equality and its implications for the proof.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the challenge of proving the reverse implication and the need for clarity in translating statements between modular arithmetic and standard integer operations. The original poster indicates feeling lost on certain aspects of the proof.

Juanriq
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Salutations! I believe I have one implications correct and I am looking for a push in the right direction for the other.

Homework Statement


Let n be an integer and let [itex][a] \in \thinspace \mathbb{Z}_n[/itex]. Prove that there exists and element [itex]<b> \in \thinspace \mathbb{Z}_n</b>[/itex] such that [itex][a]<b> = 1</b>[/itex] if and only if [itex]\gcd (a,n) = 1[/itex].


2. The attempt at a solution
For the [itex](\Longleftarrow)[/itex]case, we know that the [itex]\gcd( a, n ) = 1[/itex] and we are trying to show [a] = [1] in [itex]\mathbb{Z}_n[/itex] We know that [itex]\exists x,y \in \mathbb{Z}[/itex] such that
[itex]ax + ny = 1 \Longrightarrow ax - 1 = -ny[/itex] but this implies that [itex]a b - 1 = vy[/itex] , where [itex]x = b[/itex] and [itex]v = -n[/itex] and also [itex]v| ab - 1[/itex].



Now, for the other implications... uh little lost. [a] = [1] implies [ab] = [1]. Can I say that [0] = [n], so [1] = [n+1] = [n] + [1], therefore [ab] - [n] = [1]?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have [ab] = [1] in Zn. What does that mean in Z?
 
In Z, it would mean that b is the multiplicative inverse of a, right? In Z we would just have ab = 1
 
Yes, if ab = 1 in Z, that's right. What I actually wanted was for you to translate this statement as is into Z; that is, tell me what this equivalence class equality means. You've already done this to prove the backwards implication, so you know how. But it's the right place to start.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K