Proving Cyclic Decompositions: Let T be a Linear Operator on V

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bhatia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving properties of cyclic decompositions related to a linear operator T on a finite-dimensional vector space V. It includes theoretical aspects of linear algebra, specifically concerning the range and null space of T, as well as the concept of T-invariant subspaces.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes to prove that the range R of a linear operator T has a complementary T-invariant subspace if and only if R is independent of the null space N of T.
  • The same participant suggests that if R and N are independent, then N is the unique T-invariant subspace complementary to R.
  • Another participant requests a definition of "T-admissible," indicating a need for clarification on terminology used in the discussion.
  • A subsequent reply provides a definition of "T-admissible," stating that a subspace W is T-admissible if it is invariant under T and satisfies a specific condition involving f(T) and vectors in W.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the term f(T) mentioned in the definition provided.
  • A hint is offered to fix a basis for the range of T and extend it to a basis for V, prompting a discussion about the implications of these extra basis vectors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the proofs or definitions discussed. There are multiple competing views and clarifications requested regarding terminology and concepts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved definitions and assumptions, particularly regarding the term "T-admissible" and the implications of the basis extension for the range of T.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in linear algebra, particularly those studying properties of linear operators and invariant subspaces, may find this discussion relevant.

Bhatia
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Let T be a linear operator on the the finite dimensional space V, and let R be the range of T.

(a) Prove that R has a complementary T-invariant subspace iff R is independent of the null space N of T.

(b) If R and N are independent, prove that, N is the unique T-invariant subspace complementary to R.

I supposed R has a complementary T - invariant subspace, say, W. Then , R should be T- admissible. I assumed to the contrary, that R intersection T is not equal to {0}. I took a point in the intersection but could not proceed further. Please suggest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you define "T-admisible"?
 
arkajad said:
Can you define "T-admisible"?

Thanks for your reply.

Given a linear operator T on a vector space V then a subspace W is T- admissible if

i) W is invariant under T
(ii) if f(T) β belongs to W, there exists a vector η in W such that f(T)β = f(T) η.
 
What is f(T) in (ii)?
 
Hint: Fix a basis for the range of T and extend it to a basis for V. What can you say about these extra basis vectors?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K