Proving Double Dual Isomorphism: A Proof for T'' = T

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the relationship T'' = T, where T is a linear mapping between finite vector spaces and T'' represents the double transpose of T. The participants are exploring the concept of dual spaces and their isomorphisms.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify definitions related to transposes and duals, questioning the original poster's notation and definitions. There is also a discussion about the isomorphism between the dual of the dual and the original vector space.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarity on definitions and the implications of those definitions on the proof. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for clear definitions to facilitate further discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the notation used for transpose and dual, which may affect the understanding of the problem. Additionally, the original poster's definition of the transpose/dual has not been explicitly stated, leading to challenges in providing advice.

wurth_skidder_23
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I am trying to prove that T'' = T (where T'' is the double transpose of T) by showing that the the dual of the dual of a linear finite vector space is isomorphic to the original vector space.

i.e., T: X --> U (A linear mapping)
The transpose of T is defined as the following:
T': U' --> X' (Here U' is the dual of U and X' is the dual of X)
And the double transpose of T is defined as:
T'': X'' --> U'' (Here X'' is the dual of the dual of X and U'' is the dual of the dual of U)
And since X'' is isomorphic to X and U'' is isomorphic to U, (This is the part I still need to prove)
T'' = T
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hold on there. I got confused because you're using * to mean transpose when * means dual, and then you talk about dual spaces... confusing.

Anyway, just use the definition of transpose (which is what, in your course?) and dual.

(Ohj, and the double dual of a (linear) vector space is not isomorphic to the original space, in general, by the way.)
 
Last edited:
I have edited my original post in hopes it will make things a little clearer.
 
The editing still omits the crucial information about what *your* definition of the 'transpose/dual' of a linear map is. In my world it is taulogically trivial that the double dual is what you started with. But as you haven't defined the 'transpose/dual' it is impossible to offer advice.
 
The definition of the dual is the linear space formed by the set of linear functions on a linear space X.
 
Now, given a linear map X-->Y how do you define the map on the duals Y*--->X*? Do it twice and what do you have?
 
Alright, thanks. I understand now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K