Proving # Equilateral Triangles on Sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter tainted
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere Triangles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the possible values of N, the total number of equilateral triangles that can tile a unit sphere in ℝ³, which are established as 4, 8, or 20. The user initially confuses this with a previous problem involving n, the number of triangles meeting at a vertex, which can only be 3, 4, or 5. The distinction between N and n is clarified, emphasizing that they represent different quantities in the context of spherical tiling.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spherical geometry
  • Familiarity with Euler's formula in graph theory
  • Knowledge of equilateral triangle properties
  • Basic concepts of tiling and polyhedral structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Euler's formula and its applications in polyhedral geometry
  • Research the properties of spherical tilings and their classifications
  • Explore the relationship between vertex configurations and triangle counts on spheres
  • Investigate the implications of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem in spherical geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, students studying topology, and anyone interested in the properties of spherical tilings and polyhedra.

tainted
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok, I have this problem this week. (1)
<br /> Consider\ a\ tiling\ of\ the\ unit\ sphere\ in\ \mathbb{R}^{3}\ by\ N\ equilateral\\<br /> triangles\ so\ that\ the\ triangles\ meet\ full\ edge\ to\ full\ edge\ (and\ vertex\ to\ vertex).\\<br /> Show\ that\ the\ only\ possibilities\ for\ N\ are\ N = 4,\ N = 8,\ or\ N = 20.

Last week, we had the problem that follows (2)
<br /> Consider\ a\ tiling\ of\ the\ unit\ sphere\ in\ \mathbb{R}^{3}\ by\ equilateral\\<br /> triangles\ so\ that\ the\ triangles\ meet\ full\ edge\ to\ full\ edge\ (and\ vertex\ to\\<br /> vertex).\ Suppose\ n\ such\ triangles\ meet\ an\ one\ vertex.\ Show\ that\ the\ only\\<br /> possibilities\ for\ n\ are\ n = 3,\ n = 4,\ n = 5.

Alright so my problem is that it seems to be nearly the exact same statement except (2) uses n while (1) uses N.

If that is true then wouldn't it be impossible to prove N can only be 4, 8, or 20 if I proved it was only 3, 4, or 5 last week.

Homework Equations


Area of each triangle = 3a - ∏

The Attempt at a Solution


Considering my question isn't for the solution rather than help understanding what it is saying/how this would be possible, I don't have any work yet.

If requested, I can show my answer to (2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:


Alright thanks man, that's all I needed, I got it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K