Proving Homomorphism of F^(n) onto F^(m) with Kernel Isomorphic to F^(n-m)

  • Thread starter Thread starter happyg1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structures
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the existence of a homomorphism from F^(n) onto F^(m) with a kernel that is isomorphic to F^(n-m), where n is greater than m. The context involves vector spaces over a field F and the properties of linear maps.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to formalize their intuitive understanding of the homomorphism and its kernel. Some participants suggest considering explicit representations of elements in F^n and the implications for defining a homomorphism. Others propose using the first isomorphism theorem to relate the kernel to F^(n-m) and discuss the properties of projection maps.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different angles and clarifying concepts. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of projection maps and the first isomorphism theorem, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's uncertainty regarding the definitions and properties of the involved vector spaces and homomorphisms, particularly in relation to their previous studies on rings and isomorphisms.

happyg1
Messages
304
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



HI, I'm working on this:
If n>m, prove that there is a homomorphism of F^(n) onto F^(m) with a kernel W which is isomorphic to F^(n-m).

Homework Equations



Def: If U and V are vector spaces over F (a field) then the mapping T of U onto V is said to be a homomorphism if:
a) (u1+u2)T=u1T+u2T
b) (a u1)T=a(u1)T

If T in addition is one-to-one, we call it and isomorphism. The Kernel ot T is defined as {u in U|uT=0} where o is the identity element of the addition in V.

The Attempt at a Solution


These are my thoughts:
It seems trivial to me that there is a homomorphism from F^(n) onto F^(m) since n>m. I just don't know how to formalize that argument. I can't get a picture in my mind to write it down.
The part about the kernel of the homomorphism isomorphic to F^(n-m) also seems to be intuitively simple..the kernel will have n-m elements in it, so there's got to be an isomorphism between the kernel and F^(n-m).

Please help me clarify and formalize this.
thanks
cc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what is F^n explicitly? Write down a general element in F^n and it should be obvious where to send this in F^m to get a homomorphism (usually called a linear map in this case) with the desired properties. Think about the case F=R, the real numbers.
 
Without working out the details explicitly, I would imagine the multivariate projection map from [tex]F^n \rightarrow F^m[/tex] should satisfy the homomorphism conditions.

Furthermore, have you considered using the first isomorphism theorem for rings to help formally show that [tex]F^{n-m}[/tex] is isomorphic to the kernel?

It shouldn't be too hard to show that the projection map [tex]\pi (x)[/tex] is surjective, and so that [tex]Image(\pi(x))=F^m[/tex] is a subring of [tex]F^n[/tex]. Then [tex]F^m[/tex] is isomorphic to [tex]F^n \setminus_{Ker(\pi)}[/tex]. Consider the natural map between these two sets and then see if you can get anything from there.

This might be a bit over the top, but was the first thing that came to my mind.
 
Thanks for the input. It's been a year since I studied rings and I'm all rusty. I'm pretty sure I understand this one and I think I got it.

My next question is this:Prove that there exists an isomorphism from [tex]F^n[/tex] into [tex]Hom(Hom(F^n , F),F).[/tex]
Again, I'm all rusty on this stuff, so any input will be helpful.
My confusion here lies in that I just finished proving (by contradiction) that [tex]F^1[/tex] is not isomorphic to [tex]F^n[/tex] for n>1.
So I'm not sure what [tex]F[/tex] is or what [tex]Hom(F^n,F)[/tex] looks like. It seems to me that [tex]F^n[/tex] is finite and [tex]F[/tex] is infinite and then my mind just starts going in circles. Please help me understand this.
thanks
CC
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K