Proving Inequalities in Taylor Series: A Scientific Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving inequalities related to Taylor series, specifically showing that a function is greater than its Taylor polynomial. The subject area includes analysis and series expansions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of the problem, questioning how to demonstrate that a function exceeds its Taylor series. There are attempts to use induction and discussions about the implications of the function being analytic.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights regarding the distinction between the function and its Taylor polynomial, noting that the Taylor series is equal to the function itself while the polynomial is a finite approximation. There is an ongoing exploration of how to express the reasoning mathematically.

Contextual Notes

Participants have noted the lack of explicit conditions, such as the assumption that x > 0, which may affect the validity of their arguments. The discussion includes consideration of the remainder term in Taylor series.

transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/1323/29081539pt7.th.gif

how am i supposed to prove that the function is bigger then its tailor series??

the taylor series are written in endless way.
its should be equal

how to prove that its bigger??

for the first i tried prove by induction:

the base case
[tex] f_1(x) = e^x - \left( 1 + x\right)\\[/tex]
i know that x>0
but it doesn't prove that
[tex] f_1(x)>0[/tex]
??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to recognize that the problem is NOT to proved "the function is bigger then its tailor series". Both of these functions are "analytic" and so they are equal to their Taylor series. You are asked to show that the functions are greater than the Taylor polynomial up to power n, in the first case, and to second power for the second. The right sides are finite sums.

Since each function is equal to its Taylor series, the only difference is that the Taylor polynomial, of order n, is missing all terms past n.

If x> 0 all those missing terms are positive. (In the middle of your post you say "I know that x>0". HOW do you know that? Is it a condition of the problem? You don't mention that!)
 
you are correct i wasnt given that x>0
so my general function are bigger then their taylor series by the remainder of Rn

this is the logic
how to formulate it into equation??
 
how to prove it?
 
how to prove it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K