Proving Invariance of Subsets under Group Actions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the invariance of subsets under group actions, specifically demonstrating that a subset Y of a set X is invariant under the action of a subgroup of a group G if and only if gY = Y. It is established that if Y is finite, the condition gY ⊆ Y suffices for invariance. The proof relies on the definitions of group actions and the properties of subsets, emphasizing that if Y is invariant under , then all elements of gY must also belong to Y, leading to a contradiction if gY ≠ Y.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically group actions.
  • Familiarity with the concept of invariance in mathematical sets.
  • Knowledge of finite and infinite sets in the context of group actions.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and logical reasoning.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of group actions in detail, focusing on invariant subsets.
  • Explore the implications of finite versus infinite sets in group theory.
  • Learn about the concept of orbits and stabilizers in group actions.
  • Investigate examples of group actions on various mathematical structures, such as integers and polynomials.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and researchers in abstract algebra, particularly those studying group theory and its applications in mathematics. It is also useful for anyone interested in understanding the behavior of subsets under group actions.

playa007
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let G be a group acting on a set X, and let g in G. Show that a subset Y of X is invariant under the action of the subgroup <g> of G iff gY=Y. When Y is finite, show that assuming gY is a subset of Y is enough.


Homework Equations


If Y is a subset of X, we write GY for the set { g·y : y Y and g G}. We call the subset Y invariant under G if GY = Y (which is equivalent to GY ⊆ Y)


The Attempt at a Solution


gY=Y implies that gy is in Y for all g in G and y in Y. G is a group so all powers of G would be in G as well. so <g>Y=Y must be true also and Y is invariant under action of <g>. If Y was invariant under the action of <g> but gY=/=Y. This would mean that there exists some y' in Y such that gy =/= y' so the set <g>Y would not contain the element y' and <g>Y would not equal to Y which contradicts that Y is invariant. I'm also wondering how to proceed for finite case. Any help would be much appreciated; thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I really don't even understand your proof of the first part. Can you work on it? But here's what you should be thinking about. Take Z the set of integers. Take G to be the actions on Z defined by g_a(z)=z+a for all a in Z. G is a group, right? Now take Y to be the positive integers. g_1(Y) is contained in Y, right again? Y IS NOT invariant under <g_1>. Why not? But then Y is infinite. Why can't this happen if you have a group action leaving a FINITE set invariant?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K