Proving irreflexive and symmetric relation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving whether a given relation is irreflexive and symmetric over a set A. The relation is defined in terms of subsets of A and involves elements from those subsets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of irreflexivity and explore potential counterexamples, particularly focusing on the relationship between sets and their elements. There are attempts to clarify the implications of the relation being irreflexive and symmetric.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach proving the symmetric aspect of the relation and suggested using contradiction for the irreflexive part. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and implications of the relation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of set relations and are encouraged to consider definitions carefully. There is mention of a need for clarity regarding the conditions under which the relation holds.

Aaron7
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am on the final part of a question and I have to prove that the following is a irreflexive symmetric relation over A or if it is not then give a counter example.

R is given as an irreflexive symmetric relation over A.

Relation: {(X, Y) | X ⊆ A ∧ Y ⊆ A ∧ ∀x ∈ X.∀y ∈ Y.(x, y) ∈ R}

Homework Equations


See above.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have worked out the if X x Y ⊆ R then (X,Y) is put into the relation.
I worked out a simple example to see if it was worth trying to prove and it seems to be correct.
I am having trouble getting my head around trying to make a start to prove this.

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Irreflexive means not reflexive, yes? Then a possible counter-example might exist when X and Y are not disjoint. Wouldn't it?
 
I think your counterexample is incorrect.
R needs to be irreflexive, so if two sets have an element in common, R is not irreflexive and so the sets don't belong to the relation.
 
Let's call your relation J.

To prove the symmetric part. Assume X J Y, this means
X ⊆ A ∧ Y ⊆ A ∧ ∀x ∈ X.∀y ∈ Y.(x, y) ∈ R and (X,Y) belongs to J
use the fact that R is symmetric to arrive at
Y ⊆ A ∧ X ⊆ A ∧ ∀y ∈ Y.∀x ∈ X.(y, x) ∈ R and (Y,X) belongs to J
which means Y J X

To prove the irreflexive part i would go for a contradiction. Since the statement you have to prove is a negative one. Which is: "for any set X, (X,X) does not belong to J". So assume the contrary and reach a contradiction.
 
Thank you for the help. I think I was too worried about the complexity of the set rather than using the definition to simply prove it. I should be able to move on to some more complex ones now.

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K