Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Proving K+U is constant with tensor notation.

  1. Sep 5, 2015 #1
    Suppose we have a system of particles that interact via conservative forces. I wish to prove that ##K+U## is a constant of the system with tensor analysis. Here is my procedure:

    The Lagrangian is ##L=\frac{1}{2}m_i\dot{ r_i}^2-\Phi##

    Lagrange's equations ##\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{r_i}}) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial r_i}## yield

    ##m_i\ddot{r_i}=-\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial r_i}##
    If the RHS is multiplied by ##\dot{r_i}## we get the chain rule for partial derivatives and get ##\frac{d}{dt}\Phi## which would be a crucial step in my derivation. However the LHS ends up with three indices which is not allowed. And that is the crux of my problem. How do I avoid this three indices to prove this property of classical mechanics?
    Namely
    ##m_i\dot{r_i}\ddot{r_i}=-\dot{r_i}\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial r_i}##

    is not allowed.

    Thanks.

    I'm not terribly familiar with Lagrangian mechanics so I could've screwed up in this respect somewhere.

    In case its not obvious what I'm trying to prove, it is that ##\frac{d}{dt}(K+U)=0## for n-particles interacting via conservative forces. I'm specifically looking for a derivation with tensor analysis. I know of other derivations.
     
    Last edited: Sep 5, 2015
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 5, 2015 #2
    I've noticed ##m_i \ddot{r_i} = -\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial r_i}## is wrong too. As the LHS is a scalar value.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Proving K+U is constant with tensor notation.
  1. Notation (Replies: 2)

Loading...