Proving limit of rational function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the limit of a rational function, specifically the limit of \( \frac{x}{x+1} \) as \( x \) approaches 1. Participants explore the implications of bounding \( |x - 1| \) and its effect on \( |x + 1| \), as well as the use of epsilon-delta definitions in limit proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss bounding \( |x - 1| \) and how it leads to implications for \( |x + 1| \). There are attempts to decompose the rational function and apply limit definitions, with questions about the validity of certain steps in the proofs. Some participants express confusion about the implications of their manipulations involving absolute values.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the assumptions made regarding \( |x - 1| \) and its implications. Some participants have provided insights into the necessity of bounding \( |x - 1| \) to avoid undefined behavior in the limit, while others are questioning the correctness of their own proofs and the reasoning behind certain steps.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is a focus on understanding the epsilon-delta approach and its application to the problem at hand.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1715475352922.png

The solution is,
1715475387370.png

However, I'm confused how ##0 < | x - 1|< 1## (Putting a bound on ##| x- 1|##) implies that ##1 < |x+1| < 3##. Does someone please know how?

My proof is,
##0 < | x - 1|< 1##
##|2| < | x - 1| + |2| < |2| + 1##
##2 < |x - 1| + |2| < 3##
Then take absolute values of all three sides of the equation,
##|2| < ||x - 1| + |2|| < |3|##
This allows us to remove the absolute values around the x - 1 and 2. Thus,
##|2| < |x - 1 + 2| < |3|##
##|2| < |x + 1| < |3|##
##2 < |x + 1| < 3##

However, the two on the LHS side is wrong.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{x}{x+1}=1-\frac{1}{x+1}
The problem is reduced to prove
\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{1}{x+1} = \frac{1}{2} or further
\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} x = 1
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
anuttarasammyak said:
\frac{x}{x+1}=1-\frac{1}{x+1}
The problem is reduced to prove
\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{1}{x+1} = \frac{1}{2} or further
\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} x = 1
Thank you for your reply @anuttarasammyak! That is actually a very interesting idea to prove a rational function converges from first principles by decomposing the rational function by using partial fractions then using algebra of limits. I think you could also use first principles on ##x## and ##x + 1## by using the definition of limit, then maybe add the results? I.e prove that x goes to 1 as x goes to 1, and x + 1 goes to 2 as x goes to 1 respectively? However, how would we add these epsilon and delta proof to prove that our rational function converges to ##\frac{1}{2}##. Do you please know whether we just divide them, by each other or something like that?

However, do you please know how to solve using my method?

Thanks!
 
We are interested in the neighborhood of ##x=1## so assuming ##0< |x-1|<1## is not a problem. The left inequality is always true, and the right one means
\begin{align*}
|x-1| < 1 \Longleftrightarrow 0<x<2 \Longleftrightarrow 1<x+1<3
\end{align*}
We get therefore
$$
\dfrac{|x-1|}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{1}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{1}{2\cdot 1}=\dfrac{1}{2}
$$
But this isn't small enough. We have to narrow down ##|x-1|##. If ##\delta = 2\varepsilon ## and ##|x-1| < \delta ## then
$$
\dfrac{|x-1|}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{\delta}{2|x+1|}=\dfrac{2\varepsilon }{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{2\varepsilon }{2\cdot 1}=\varepsilon .
$$
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
fresh_42 said:
We are interested in the neighborhood of ##x=1## so assuming ##0< |x-1|<1## is not a problem. The left inequality is always true, and the right one means
\begin{align*}
|x-1| < 1 \Longleftrightarrow 0<x<2 \Longleftrightarrow 1<x+1<3
\end{align*}
We get therefore
$$
\dfrac{|x-1|}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{1}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{1}{2\cdot 1}=\dfrac{1}{2}
$$
But this isn't small enough. We have to narrow down ##|x-1|##. If ##\delta = 2\varepsilon ## and ##|x-1| < \delta ## then
$$
\dfrac{|x-1|}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{\delta}{2|x+1|}=\dfrac{2\varepsilon }{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{2\varepsilon }{2\cdot 1}=\varepsilon .
$$
Thank you for your reply @fresh_42!

That is very helpful. However, do you please know why my proof for the absolute value implication is wrong?

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @fresh_42!

That is very helpful. However, do you please know why my proof for the absolute value implication is wrong?

Thanks!
What do you mean? The picture you uploaded was ok, except for the corrected factor ##2.##

Do you mean what you typed below your picture? I guess ...
ChiralSuperfields said:
This allows us to remove the absolute values around the x - 1 and 2.
... is the culprit, but I am notoriously bad with absolute values. I always have to scribble a lot to get it right.

My solution was ##0<|x-1|<1 \Longrightarrow 0<x<2 \Longrightarrow 1<x+1<3.## I don't understand why you made it so complicated.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, do you please know how to solve using my method?
d:= x-1
|\frac{x}{1+x}-\frac{1}{2}|=\frac{1}{4}|\frac{d}{1+\frac{d}{2}}| &lt; |d|
for ##d## satisfying
-1 &lt; d &lt; 1
[EDIT] I had confused the two and corrected. By contgrolling ##d## we can make it smaller than any given constant.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
anuttarasammyak said:
Say
\epsilon = x-1
|\delta|=|\frac{x}{1+x}-\frac{1}{2}|=\frac{1}{4}|\frac{\epsilon}{1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}}| &lt; |\epsilon|
for ##\epsilon## satisfying
-1 &lt; \epsilon &lt; 1
This is nothing but confusing.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak and member 731016
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, I'm confused how ##0 < | x - 1|< 1## (Putting a bound on ##| x- 1|##) implies that ##1 < |x+1| < 3##. Does someone please know how?
Since ## |x-1| < 1, 0 < x < 2##. Therefore, ##1<x+1< 3##.
ChiralSuperfields said:
##|2| < ||x - 1| + |2|| < |3|##
This allows us to remove the absolute values around the x - 1 and 2. Thus,
##|2| < |x - 1 + 2| < |3|##
This is wrong. If ##x-1 < 0## then ##x-1+2 <2##. It is possible that ##|x-1+2| < 2##.
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, do you please know how to solve using my method?
I think it may be fundamentally flawed.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #10
It should be pointed out why the assumption ##|x-1| < 1## is made here: The purpose is to find a ##\delta## such that ##x/(x+1)## differs from 1/2 by at most ##\epsilon##. Restricting ##\delta < 1## is not a problem - if you could find a ##\delta \geq 1##, a ##\delta < 1## would clearly also suffice.

The issue if you do not restrict ##\delta## to some value smaller than 2, then ##x+1 = 0## becomes a possibility and ##|x/(x+1)|## is unbounded. Particularly larger than ##\epsilon## around ##x = -1##. So we choose to restrict ##\delta## to avoid this. Then, as mentioned above, we need to further restrict ##\delta## for values of ##\epsilon > 1/2##.

Note that we could have chosen ##\delta < k < 2## instead. This would imply
$$
\frac{|x-1|}{|x+1|} < \frac{k}{2-k}
$$
which is sufficient if ##\epsilon > k/(2(2-k))##. If not, then
$$
\frac{|x-1|}{|x+1|} < \frac{\delta}{2-k}
$$
and choosing ##\delta < (2-k)2\epsilon## works.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K