Proving Limitless Values in Point z=0 for Function's Loren Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter nhrock3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Point
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the nature of the point z=0 for the function f(z)=cos(exp(1/z)) using its Laurent series. Participants are exploring the concept of essential singularities and the behavior of limits at this point.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to demonstrate that z=0 is an essential singularity by analyzing the Laurent series and the limits from different sides. Some participants question the definition of the function and the nature of the limits involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the characteristics of the Laurent series and the implications of having infinite negative powers. There is a focus on understanding the limits and the conditions under which they exist or do not exist, with some guidance provided on the definitions of analytic points and essential singularities.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a lack of clarity regarding the limits presented in the original solution, as well as the difficulty in interpreting the provided image. Participants are also navigating language barriers related to mathematical terminology.

nhrock3
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
i need to prove that the in point z=0
its loren series has endless values(i don't know the proper english term)
and their presented solution
http://i48.tinypic.com/1zb7401.jpg
(click on the photo to enlarge)

i thought of just breaking the function into a series
and it will have endless members of z in negative power.


i know that they are trying to prove that we get different limit values
so there is no limit which is a sign of that type of point

but there is no limits in their solution
i can't see limits and their results
what is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You appear (your picture is difficult to read even enlarged) to be saying that
[tex]z_n= \frac{1}{ln(n\pi)}[/tex].

Now, what do you mean by its Laurent series? A Laurent series is a power series, involving negative powers, of a function around a point where the function is not analytic. Here you have "[itex]z_n[/itex]", a sequence of points. What function are you talking about?
 
there are 3 types of points in don't know the engish term for them
first type of point: if the limit is constant or 0
second type of point:if the limit goes to infinity
third type is: if there is no limit
my function is
f(z)=cos(exp(1/z))
i need to prove that z=0 is the third type of a point

their solution says something about limit different from different sides

but there is no limit expressions


i thought of solving it by breaking it into a series arounf point z=0
and then i will get endless members with z in negative power
which is also a sign for the third type

but i want to understand how they say limits from both sides
without presenting them?
 
Okay, a function is "analytic" at a point if it has a Taylor's series at that point and, for some neighborhood of the point, the series converges to the value of the function.

If a function is not analytic at a point, we can still write it as a "Laurent" series, with negative exponents. If the series has only a finite number of negative exponents with non-zero coefficient, the the function has a "pole" of that point (with the order of the pole given by highest negative exponent).

If the Laurent series requires an infinite number of negative exponents, then the function has an "essential singularity" at the point. You want to show that cos(e^{1/z}) has an essential singularity at z= 0.

Notice that if f(z) has a "pole of order n", then [itex]f(z)= a_{-n}z^{-n}+ a_{-n+1}z^{-n+1}[/itex][itex]+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_{-1}z^{-1}+ a_0+ a_1z+ a_2z^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot[/itex]. That is, there is a "lowest power", -n. If you multiply both sides of that by [itex]z^n[/itex] you get [itex]z^nf(z)= a_{-n}+ a_{-n+1}z+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_{-1}z_{n-1}+ a_0z^n+[/itex][itex]a_1z^{n+1}+ a_2z^{n+2}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot[/itex] which has no negative exponents. Then [itex]\lim_{z\to 0} z^n f(z)= a_{-n}[/itex], a non-zero constant. If there is NO n such that that is true, f has an essential singularity at z=0.

You want to show that [itex]\lim_{z\to 0}z^n cos(e^{1/z})[/itex] does NOT exist no matter what n is.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K