MHB Proving Linear Maps are One-to-One

  • Thread starter Thread starter baseball3030
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
baseball3030
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
One to One

Prove that A linear map T: Rn->Rm is one to one:

Again, the only thing I can think of doing is possibly using rank nullity theorem but then again I think this can be proved by using independence assumption.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: find a basis of $\mathbb{R}^n$ (the columns of $I_n$ will do) and show that the image of this basis under $T$ cannot be linearly independent in $\mathbb{R}^m$. Use this to show that $\mathbf{0} \in \mathrm{R}^m$ has two preimages under $T$.​
 
From a previous topic, if $B$ is any basis for $\Bbb R^n$, then $T(B)$ is linearly independent if $T$ is 1-1.

Thus $\text{dim}(\text{im}(T)) = |T(B)| = n$.

Since any basis $C$ of $\Bbb R^m$ is a MAXIMAL linearly independent set, we have $n \leq m$, contradicting $m < n$.

Our only assumption was that $T$ was 1-1, so this cannot be the case.

(Bacterius' approach is good, too :))
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top