Proving Little o Notation: f(x) = o(g(x)) as x → 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter zjhok2004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of little o notation, specifically in the context of two functions f and g as x approaches 0. The original poster presents statements to prove or disprove regarding integrals and derivatives of these functions under the assumption that f(x) = o(g(x)) as x → 0.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the definition of little o notation, questioning the validity of the original poster's statements regarding integrals and derivatives. Some participants provide examples to illustrate their points, while others seek clarification on the definition itself.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively questioning the assumptions and definitions related to little o notation. There is no explicit consensus, as differing interpretations of the definition have been presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining the implications of little o notation under specific conditions, such as the positivity of g and the behavior of f and g as x approaches 0. There is a focus on the definitions and properties of derivatives and integrals in this context.

zjhok2004
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given two functions f and g with derivatives in some interval containing 0, where g is positive. Assume also f(x) = o(g(x)) as x → 0. Prove or disprove each of the following statements:


a)∫f(t) dt = o(∫g(t)dt) as x → 0 (Both integrals goes from 0 to x)
b)derivative of f(x) = o( derivative of g(x)) as x → -

Can anyone show me how to prove this? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Recall, ##f = o(g)## implies :

##\forall k>0, \exists a \space | \space f(x) < kg(x), \forall x>a## where 'k' and 'a' are arbitrary constants.

That's what you meant by "Assume also f(x) = o(g(x)) as x → 0" right?
 
f=o(g) as x -> 0 means lim f/g ->0 as x ->0
 
zjhok2004 said:
f=o(g) as x -> 0 means lim f/g ->0 as x ->0


Not true, what about f = x2, then x2 = o(x3) ( For example ).

Then x2/x3 = 1/x → ±∞ as x → 0.
 
Zondrina said:
Not true, what about f = x2, then x2 = o(x3) ( For example ).

Then x2/x3 = 1/x → ±∞ as x → 0.

That is the definition of the little o notation
 
zjhok2004 said:
That is the definition of the little o notation

No, the definition is what I've given you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K